Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
i don't know... 1 for a core switch doesn't say 'overkill', its says 'expandable' ;)

 

Its very expandable and versatile (which is why I have two! although the second hasn't gone into production yet), Its just in the case of for such a small network (sub 400 devices) and small budget.

Posted (edited)
Also consider what you could do to divide you physical space up between you and the servers i.e. could a partition wall be install in you office space. My personnel view it should be possible to run all schools in 42u of rack space. Edited by nicholab
Posted

It's better to get a core switch you can expand on in future that's a bit more expensive than to get something lesser that only just meets capacity now and has to be replaced 1-2 years later imo

 

And ye I love my 5406zl as well :D

Posted
It's better to get a core switch you can expand on in future that's a bit more expensive than to get something lesser that only just meets capacity now and has to be replaced 1-2 years later imo

 

And ye I love my 5406zl as well :D

 

 

But a stackable switch is just as adaptable in 2/3 years time as you get get another switch and add to the stack!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...