Jump to content

Warning for Windows XP users buying new machines - Hard Drives now 'Advanced Format'.


Recommended Posts

Posted

So, further to my earlier post querying these new '4k' and '512e' drives, it appears that at least one manufacturer is now no longer shipping the old style hard drives - Dell. According to my supplier, hard drive manufacturers have EOLd pretty much all 512byte drives.

 

This will cause issues that need to be overcome for XP users, and also cause issues with imaging.

 

So, if you haven't done so already, read up on them, as they are here to stay, and as was suggested to me - look at moving to a newer OS.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Pretty sure you just have to put a jumper on them. I sold advanced format hard drives in my last job and we just supplied the jumper with them.

 

Other than that you have to use the Align software utility (Western Digital)

Edited by markcuk
Posted
This will cause issues that need to be overcome for XP users, and also cause issues with imaging.

 

Do you mean just imaging Windows XP, or does that include imaging Windows 7 also?

Posted
Pretty sure you just have to put a jumper on them. I sold advanced format hard drives in my last job and we just supplied the jumper with them.

 

Other than that you have to use the Align software utility (Western Digital)

 

As far as I know, 2.5" laptop drives don't come with jumpers?

 

Do you mean just imaging Windows XP, or does that include imaging Windows 7 also?

 

Depends on the tool. I don't think FOG works with them at all at the moment, according to a bug report in the tracker there. Others have different needs, such as ghost wanting an image=1mb line including in the imaging command.

 

From what I can tell, 512e drives (ie. drives that will emulate 512byte drives) should work with XP and imaging tools. The 4k drives which will eventually hit the market currently aren't supported by any Windows OS or imaging tool according to various sources.

 

My suggestion, and it is going to be what I will be doing, is to get hold of a single machine of the type you want and try it out before taking the plunge and buying a load.

Posted

I'm not sure that's 100% correct. I had a quick search online and found this:

 

Microsoft KB982018

 

If you're running Windows 7 SP1 or Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, you'll have full compatibility with 4K formatted drives (and the latest enhancements).

 

According to this document from Seagate, Microsoft introduced large sector compatibility (4K) with Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 SP1.

 

If you're running Windows XP, it will not support the 4K format, but should support 512byte emulation. There may be some performance penalty, but you could argue all schools at some point should be moving to Windows 7 SP1 for the best performance.

Posted
I'm not sure that's 100% correct. I had a quick search online and found this:

 

Microsoft KB982018

 

If you're running Windows 7 SP1 or Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, you'll have full compatibility with 4K formatted drives (and the latest enhancements).

 

According to this document from Seagate, Microsoft introduced large sector compatibility (4K) with Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 SP1.

 

If you're running Windows XP, it will not support the 4K format, but should support 512byte emulation. There may be some performance penalty, but you could argue all schools at some point should be moving to Windows 7 SP1 for the best performance.

 

No, that says just what I said - 512e drives are supported. Native 4k drives aren't. ie. the system still reads the full 4k into cache, selects the 512bytes needed and sends that to the OS. Then when writing back, the 512 gets padded with extra data to fit it back in a 4k sector.

 

So, drives that have 4k sectors, but present a 512byte emulation for systems are supported fine, but the next gen 4k native drives, without 512 emulation are not yet supported by any Windows OS.

 

So, Vista SP1+ have some better support for 4k, but it's limited in scope still.

Posted
The simplest option for supporting XP on 4k sector drives may be to virtualise it into a linux host and boot directly to that, it would be reasonably quick on a modern OS.
Posted

Manufacturers can't sell 4K native drives until more people ditch XP. :(

 

Since 4K-sector drives won’t work on Win 5.x at all, drive manufacturers can't put them on the market so long as there’s a significant legacy base. 2014 – the year that extended support ends for WinXP – looks like a good year to finally complete the move to 4K sectors. (Source)

 

The only HDDs which still use non-emulated 512 byte sectors are Hitachi's 3.5" 5K3000 and 7K3000 drives. Everything else is 4k/512e.

 

Probably the best workaround I have seen so far is found in Seagate's Momentus and Momentus Thin HDDs. These drives feature a technology called SmartAlign which automatically aligns data on-the-fly before it is written to disk. Because this is a firmware-based solution you don't have to do anything different to what you are already doing (even with XP). To see how it works, check out Seagate's patent: www.google.com/patents/about?id=GxbLAAAAEBAJ.

Posted
So, drives that have 4k sectors, but present a 512byte emulation for systems are supported fine, but the next gen 4k native drives, without 512 emulation are not yet supported by any Windows OS.

 

Thanks for clearing that up :) It does seem odd that not even Windows 7 supports these native 4K drives. If that's the case then XP really is irrelevant, as manufacturers will be forced to use 4K/512byte emulation drives for the next 10 years at least. XP is supported until 2014 and Windows 7 2020.

 

I would of thought Windows 8 would support 4K drives natively and Windows Vista/7 will probably receive it in Windows Vista SP3 and Windows 7 SP2 sometime in the future.

Posted
What is also weird about this is that the hard drive industry has been talking about making these advanced format drives for over a decade... So it isn't as if Microsoft has been hit with this suddenly.
Posted (edited)
I would of thought Windows 8 would support 4K drives natively and Windows Vista/7 will probably receive it in Windows Vista SP3 and Windows 7 SP2 sometime in the future.

There's not going to be another service pack for Vista. Its mainstream support phase ends in 179 days time.

Edited by Arthur
Posted

I am a little surprised if there will be no Vista SP3. Microsoft released SP3 for XP in its final days of mainstream support and they're soon releasing Office 2007 SP3 which is kind of Vista's generation, just as Office 2003 SP3 was Windows XP SP3's generation.

 

I admit Vista isn't one of Microsoft's highlights - it wasn't used as much as they'd hoped, but still, there are people who have paid their hard earned cash for it. Vista's mainstream support is ending in April 2012, so there's still some time yet.

Posted
Do the latest versions of Mac OS Lion and Linux support 4K drives natively, or is it just Microsoft who have forgotten about it?

From Western Digital's website...

 

Mac OS X:

Mac OS X version 10.4 onwards (Tiger, Leopard, Snow Leopard and Lion) can use the GUID Partitioning Table scheme (GPT) which will align an Advanced Format drive correctly. Mac OS versions using Apple Partition Manager (APM) will not align partitions correctly and will not provide optimum performance.

 

Linux

Linux as an operating system is a combination of a kernel, user space utilities and customized packaging provided within the "distributions" such as Ubuntu, SuSE and Redhat.

 

The Linux kernel has had specific support for the alternate sector sizes and offsets used by WD Advanced Format disk drives since version 2.6.31. However, distributions based on Linux 2.6.34, the latest stable version of Linux, will provide the most thorough support. Advanced Format parameters are available in the sysfs file system from this kernel version onwards. Kernel versions older than 2.6.31 will not specifically detect Advanced Format Drives, but with proper alignment the system performance will be maintained. (Source)

Posted
As localzuk stated earlier Arthur, it doesn't state anywhere in your source that these support native 4K drives. It could still be talking about 4K/512byte emulation drives.
Posted
Vista's mainstream support is ending in April 2012, so there's still some time yet.

I would be very surprised if there was a SP3 for Vista, considering Vista won't be getting Internet Explorer 10.

 

Assuming Internet Explorer 10 comes about a year from now—just as Internet Explorer 9 took about a year from its first Platform Preview at MIX10 to the final release—then, depending on which day of the week the software ships, Windows Vista will either still be in mainstream support when Internet Explorer 10 ships, or will have dropped out of mainstream support by a matter of days, after having been generally available for just over five years.

 

In contrast, when Windows XP received Internet Explorer 8 on March 29, 2009, it had been on the market for more than seven years, and it too was just on the cusp of losing mainstream support (Windows XP Service Pack 3's mainstream support ended on April 14, 2009). (Source)

Posted
I think the only reason XP got SP3 was because it was so long until the next release of Windows, 7 was realitivly quick after Vista and so they don't feel the same need to keep patching over it. SP3 for Vista would be a good thing as Vista really was not that bad but again I think the court of popular public 'opinion' has killed off Vista so adly that any chance of additional support or life extending has been killed. Just like open booting environments or software that does not rely on an active net connection.
Posted

I'm not too surprised Vista won't get IE10. It seems only the flagship OS and the one before it will get IE10. This'll mean just Windows 7, Windows 8 and their server equivalents.

 

You're probably right Synack, not that I am too worried about Windows Vista. I can literally count on my hand the number of Vista machines I have in a domain! :)

Posted
It could still be talking about 4K/512byte emulation drives.

You could be right. It's hard to know for sure because the first 4Kn drives won't be available to buy until next year.

 

Enterprise-class storage products using AF will incorporate the “native” implementation of AF, where data on the AF native hard drive will be passed to the host in the same sector increments as physically stored on the disk media.

 

Generation One AF native hard drives will employ the 4,096 bytes-per-sector architecture, and are referred to as “AF 4Kn”. Starting 2012, hard drive manufacturers will commence shipment of Generation One AF 4Kn enterprise-class hard drives. (Source)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...