somabc Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Your profile says you live in London, so surely that should be "not only did WE not get the world cup, WE were last" Ha Ha, no I don't think so that's not how it works. Do you think England would have had a better bid if they combined with Wales & Scotland? Holland / Belgium and Spain / Portugal both put joint bids.
beeswax Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Going by what the BBC said... Russia might be happy to rollover to FIFA demands and that may have been a silent factor. Fifa's demand to be exempt of UK money-laundering legislation | Football | The Guardian I don't blame the BBC, the Sunday Times, or the Guardian for that matter. If rumours are to be believed Sepp Blatter favoured the Russian bid, and in retrospect it isn't too difficult to see why Russia was chosen. It is a disappointment, but tomorrow's another day. Let's move on.
beeswax Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 So they plan on putting a tournament in one of the coldest most under-developed (yet largest) countries in the world. Then 4 years later put it in one of the top 3 richest GDP wise countries, one of the hottest in the world, which is half the size of Wales? ...and 96.4% sand according to the radio.
beeswax Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Russia only got it because: a) They paid a bigger bribe than we did. b) We've got Panorama and they haven't. c) We're sh!t at football. England may have played badly in South Africa, but at least they qualified, which Russia failed to achieve.
somabc Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 (edited) BBC News - London to lose £1bn if England's 2018 World Cup bid fails Mr Coleman said the bid decision was "still too close to call". The combined efforts of David Beckham, Prince William and David Cameron lead to naff all. Why am I not surprised? Edited December 2, 2010 by somabc
Hightower Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 The combined efforts of David Beckham, Prince William and David Cameron lead to naff all. Why am I not surprised? Because Sepp Blatter is (allegedly) corrupt and has (allegedly) taken a bribe. Not even Michael Jackson himself could (allegedly) compete with that Do you think England would have had a better bid if they combined with Wales & Scotland? Holland / Belgium and Spain / Portugal both put joint bids. So, by that I'm guessing your either Welsh or Scottish (and I'll take a guess at Scottish ). And I'm also assuming you're living in London? And if you're living in London I'm also assuming you are employed in London?
somabc Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 So, by that I'm guessing your either Welsh or Scottish (and I'll take a guess at Scottish ). And I'm also assuming you're living in London? And if you're living in London I'm also assuming you are employed in London? Yes indeed but living in London does not make you English does it? If I were French and moved from Paris to London would I become English? If I moved to Paris would I become French? When? Anyway I'd support hosting the world cup in the UK* * (anywhere in the UK honestly)
Hightower Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Yes indeed but living in London does not make you English does it? If I moved from Paris to London would I become English? If I moved to Paris would I become French? When? Anyway I'd support hosting the world cup in the UK* * (anywhere in the UK honestly) I wasn't trying to say that you become that nationality. But I know that if I moved to a foreign land I'd support something that was going to benefit the country that was so kindly feeding me. Anyhow, the point is irrelevant now because you've just said you'd quite happily support it
somabc Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 I still think the bid was poor, why have games in Milton Keynes & Plymouth? You'd have to knock down the stadiums and start again!
dwhyte85 Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Well RWC is 2015... that's a fairly big event after the olympics, we can't win them all. 1
Andrew_C Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 If it was the BBCs "fault", then it makes the licence fee worth paying. To whoever said Russia is cold, it has a 'continental' climate, and will be VERY hot in the summer. The whole thing is corrupt, why are we surprised the Mafia didn't spread a few bungs around?
Hightower Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 I still think the bid was poor, why have games in Milton Keynes & Plymouth? You'd have to knock down the stadiums and start again! Yes, which is a good thing for this country. A few smaller clubs could get something good from it - surely it's better than having to build a dozen stadiums in Russia. The thing that is annoying is, if you look at the crowds from this past World Cup it was shocking. Hold the World Cup in England and you are gonna fill stadiums.
CHR1S Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Just reposting my FB rant - FIFA - No video technology so dodgy decisions can still happen! They bang on about "Kicking Racism out of Football" but give Russia and its racist neo-nazi fanatics a world cup. Want to promote football in "developing nations" that span 13 time zones, ban alcohol and alcohol advertising - screw you to the sponsors, that have 40c+ summers, no stadia, no infrastructure and national teams that a pub team could beat! Its farcical and England, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands, Belgium, Australia, Japan and America should all feel hard done by!! Time for a change! And just to be clear, this isn't sour grapes because England didn't get it as im pleased Russia got it! This is aimed at the corruption of FIFA and that alone.
somabc Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 I don't think we can blame Beckham, Wills and Cameron. Plan B was to send Rooney, Prince Andrew and Nick Clegg!
tech_guy Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Another reason why we didn't get it is because we're harbouring Julian Assange and our police couldn't be ar$ed to go looking for him to keep the Americans happy. Or do I like conspiracy theories too much?!
somabc Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Yes, which is a good thing for this country. A few smaller clubs could get something good from it - surely it's better than having to build a dozen stadiums in Russia. The thing that is annoying is, if you look at the crowds from this past World Cup it was shocking. Hold the World Cup in England and you are gonna fill stadiums. If it is good to build 1-2 new stadiums in England it must be really good to build 13 new stadiums, a road network, high speed rail links and stamp out racism and corruption in Russia
srochford Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Given that it's called the "world" cup, doesn't it make sense that it moves around the world? If Wikipedia is correct, half of them so far have been in Europe so isn't it about time we moved it somewhere else? Africa got a look in this year but there's quite a lot of people in Africa so perhaps they should get a look in before it comes back to Europe. I wonder if our response to winning the Olympics influenced the decision? At a high level there's been lots said about how wonderful it is to have the Olympics in 2012 but if you read the press or listen to the radio in London, all you get are people whinging about the chaos it will cause to traffic, the high price of the tickets, the fact that the tubes will be over crowded and so on. If that's how much people want the Olympics, perhaps FIFA didn't believe David Cameron when he tried to sell the idea of England hosting the world cup!
srochford Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Another reason why we didn't get it is because we're harbouring Julian Assange and our police couldn't be ar$ed to go looking for him to keep the Americans happy. Or do I like conspiracy theories too much?! You do like conspiracy theories too much :-) (and, apparently, the police do know where he is)
tech_guy Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 They're only saying that because the USA have given them a right kicking.
GREED Posted December 2, 2010 Author Posted December 2, 2010 (edited) Wow, nice to see so many dedicated footy fans! I must admit... Qatar??? Over Oz??? Anyways, regardless of this, the BBC somehow will still feel justified in ruining this for us, getting just 2 votes I believe, obviously the judges were not pleased suddenly (when apparently we had fewer issues overall that all the others in terms of infrastructure and funding etc). If we won... then the BBC says it forced FIFA's hand If we lose... the the BBC says it exposed the truth I think I'd rather have won (then exposed whatever), as a thorough football fan. Edited December 2, 2010 by GREED
somabc Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 The World cup does move round the world! Each governing body in FIFA takes it's turn. This year was Africa, the next world cup is in South America (Brazil) then Europe (UEFA, Russia), then Qatar (Asia).
Hightower Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 It does move around the world, but to give it to Qatar in 2022 is shocking - have they even got a national side?! Football should go where the fans are. Spain - football mad. Portugal - football mad. England - football mad. South Africa - football mad. Qatar? I thought that was just the name of an airline before today!
Andrew_C Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Football should go where the fans are.That's naïve. Football will go where the money is, whether it is television money, company sponsorship, or backhanders; and there is no one better at baksheesh than the Arabs, they even invented the word! Al-Yamamah anyone?
glennda Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 we managed to secure the 2015 rugby world cup with very little public money compared to these failed bids. in the current climate the 25+ million its probly cost us could have saved a third of becta!
bossman Posted December 2, 2010 Posted December 2, 2010 Its all about money and politics!! Why do countries have to bid at all!! Why not do it like the lottery and the countries are represented by a number but not known until the balls have come out of the machine. Those countries not wishing to take part are not entered! Once the country has been drawn they should then be exempt from the next draw. It is too simple though for very important people and of course the politicians need to have lots of PR spin put on it. Football is beginning to lose its glossy veneer and is now being shown in its true light full of backhanders and illegal activities for what? to make some people a huge amount of money and the poor punter who pays through the nose every weekend just gets shafted every time. Footballers are overpaid and underworked who don't give a fig about the people who come to watch them week after week they just want the money fullstop. I used to love football but have become totally disillusioned with the greed that has enveloped it. I now watch international rugby instead which gives me better value for my money and I get a real sense of enjoyment. I am so pleased we didn't get it as we wouldn't have heard the last of it for the next 7.5 years, we can now get on with our lives, football has taken over too many people's lives and too much of the television its getting worse than the soaps!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now