Geoff Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 No plan to currently. Any new hardware coming with Vista will be downgraded to XP.
kingswood Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 No plans to really. XP does everything the school needs it to. And I'm with Geoff- any hardware that comes with Vista will be downgraded. :-)
drjturner Posted October 26, 2006 Author Posted October 26, 2006 No plan to currently. Any new hardware coming with Vista will be downgraded to XP. Do you think this will be covered in the oem license as does xp Use of Previous Version Of SOFTWARE. If the COA which accompanies the HARDWARE identifies the SOFTWARE as Microsoft Windows XP Professional SOFTWARE, then in lieu of installing and using Microsoft Windows XP Professional SOFTWARE, you may install, use, access, display and run the same language version of ONE (1) of the following versions: Microsoft® Windows® 2000 Professional, Microsoft® Windows® NT Workstation version 4.0 or Microsoft® Windows® 98 (Second Edition) ("Downgrade Software") on the COMPUTER, provided (1) you agree that Downgrade Software support will NOT be provided hereunder by Manufacturer
kingswood Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 Do you believe that XP will be classed as "downgrade software" in the same vein as Windows 98 SE is in that provided quote when a system comes with Vista?
kingswood Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 ..and it says "support" will not be provided for the downgraded software product used in lieu of XP Pro. Makes sense to me. If you want to use XP Pro rather than Vista (if the EULA is the same) then you can- the deal will be how long MS support XP after Vista is released. And that in turn will depend on how much software with the Vista label M$ sell when it is released.
Geoff Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 Do you think this will be covered in the oem license as does xp I don't care about OEM licenses. I don't use them.
drjturner Posted October 26, 2006 Author Posted October 26, 2006 Do you believe that XP will be classed as "downgrade software" in the same vein as Windows 98 SE is in that provided quote when a system comes with Vista? Wonder why they missed out ME hmmm??? You get a person with ME you send them to pc world to buy an upgrade of xp as soon as you see the me bootup screen.
drjturner Posted October 26, 2006 Author Posted October 26, 2006 Do you think this will be covered in the oem license as does xp I don't care about OEM licenses. I don't use them. Do you get pc's without OS's on them Geoff?
kingswood Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 So- are we saying that it would *illegal* to downgrade a machine that comes preloaded with Vista to XP Pro? Is there any hard evidence from a Vista EULA that says this or anything we can read that is authoritative? Blah. No wonder I am a Mac person. M$ shaft you sideways then want it both sides...
kingswood Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 Here's an interesting take on it: http://searchwinit.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid1_gci1225802,00.html It mentions volume licensing customers typically having downgrade rights.
Geoff Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 Do you get pc's without OS's on them Geoff? Either: a) built from parts inhouse so nothing on them. b) preloaded with an image provided to the manufacturer by me/LEA/etc c) FreeDos. Worse case senario is that we buy them with XP Home on (or it's vista equivelent).
Midget Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 Yeah, it's much better to be forced to buy a new machine for £3k when they update their OS
kingswood Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 Yeah, it's much better to be forced to buy a new machine for £3k when they update their OS Apple? Is that who you are talking about? How misinformed you are if it is Apple products you're "joking" about. I wouldn't mind the laugh if it were based on fact. We run OS X on a G3 and G4 as well as G5 and now Intel Macs. We never have to buy Apple's superior design in hardware when they udate their OS. We simply want to. And the price argument is plain dumb. Good day to you sir ;-)
Ric_ Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 I think that the poll to the left ----> is a good indication of how many of us intend to be using it!
drjturner Posted October 26, 2006 Author Posted October 26, 2006 It works very well on the core and core2 apples we get a rating of 4 on the mac book pro core. I wish I could have waited to upgrade my laptop to a mac book / pro. Oh well will have to work out who I can palm my dell off to.
webman Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 I think that the poll to the left ----> Do you have a different view of the Edugeek website than the rest of us?
Ric_ Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 @webman: Maybe I've been staring at too many computer screens. Or maybe it was the walk to the music block earlier today!
Gatt Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 Don't plan to deploy vista till at least 2008 - allows me to fully test it first with GPO's in Win2k3 R2, along with software support. Also gives a chance for the inevitable SP1 to be released I can see no immediate benefit to putting Vista on PC's - other than to confuse every pupil and teacher which would be fun for a day - lol
webman Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 I can see no immediate benefit to putting Vista on PC's - other than to confuse every pupil and teacher which would be fun for a day - lol I find changing the XP theme does that all by itself. I use Windows classic (much faster than luna) on my profile, and some kid asked why I was using Windows 98
Midget Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 I can see no immediate benefit to putting Vista on PC's - other than to confuse every pupil and teacher which would be fun for a day - lol I find changing the XP theme does that all by itself. I use Windows classic (much faster than luna) on my profile, and some kid asked why I was using Windows 98 I had the librarian ask me that when I altered her profile to be a bit faster and have more local admin rights (for her library software).
Teth Posted October 26, 2006 Posted October 26, 2006 Yea no plans to impliment Vista until "Vista server" rolls out and has some realworld benefit to running it over 2k3 etc. Then I'll do the whole lot hopefully by then enough of the school with have built up a familiarity with it at home. And as for windows classic. I get that all the time here too. Pupil mandatory profile has the blue and green theme, teachers get silver and green and Admin accounts get windows classic. Easy to see whats logged on where when you glance ina door.
eejit Posted October 27, 2006 Posted October 27, 2006 What's the matter with you guys? Vista is out on Jan 31st, and we need to be deploying it on Feb 1st. Have you seen the new deployment stuff? Maaaaaan! No more Ghost, no more MSIs, no more different images for different machines, gazillions of new group policies to make locking down machines much more flexible. Have a look here: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2006/11/Deployment/default.aspx Can't wait. (BTW, we're on that license that allows us to use the latest version of Ms products on their release "software assurance" I think it's called, - I know that that is not applicable to a lot of schools)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now