Dom_ Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 I saw it last week, and enjoyed it, was a bit long though... A couple of days after I saw it I heard someone talking about it on the radio, he said: "oh my god, avatar is so great, and the 3d is amazing. Someone came back from the toilet half way through the film and I thought he was in the movie, seriously!" I thought the 3D was good, but not as good as the hype imo...
Simcfc73 Posted January 19, 2010 Posted January 19, 2010 Just got back after seeing it.. think I sa a bot too close but some of the 3d was awesome.. the story was lame though and its too long by about 45 mins. Won the tickets on the radio so was well worth it
StewartKnight Posted January 19, 2010 Posted January 19, 2010 The film was too preachy for my liking! Typical yank offering! (Yes I know Cameron is Canadian.....) The 3D was good, I enjoyed it, but to me the HUD's were the star, and the 3D made them come to life!
kevbaz Posted January 19, 2010 Posted January 19, 2010 Well i thought the movie was awesome and the 3d and cgi were outstanding, i didnt have any of this non focusing melarky people are complaining about! stunning
SimpleSi Posted January 30, 2010 Posted January 30, 2010 (edited) Just got back - thought some of the "real" scenes weren't very good in 3D but some (but not all) of the CGI looked great. I was pretty impressed with an advert with a head that came out of the screen before the film though Si Edited January 30, 2010 by SimpleSi
mac_shinobi Posted January 30, 2010 Posted January 30, 2010 Well i thought the movie was awesome and the 3d and cgi were outstanding, i didnt have any of this non focusing melarky people are complaining about! stunning Went on an orange weds and thought the same
Dos_Box Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 I saw it (eventually) last night. It was teh forst 3d forl I'd seen in teh cinemas and I was very impressed. I loved every minute of it, however I did think that the portrayal of the 'bulldoze and be damned' corporate and military was a bit OTT. Still, I kept the glasses. Do they work on home 3d Blu-Ray and DVD does anyone know?
mac_shinobi Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 I saw it (eventually) last night. It was teh forst 3d forl I'd seen in teh cinemas and I was very impressed. I loved every minute of it, however I did think that the portrayal of the 'bulldoze and be damned' corporate and military was a bit OTT. Still, I kept the glasses. Do they work on home 3d Blu-Ray and DVD does anyone know? Assuming you have a 3D hd tv it should do but good question though would be nice to know
Dom_ Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Doesn't work with a standard HDTV - i was hoping this too!
Dos_Box Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Meh! The horrid red and green paper ones just don't work, and my 3 year old tears them up anyway.
ahuxham Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 There are so many different formats of 3D it's hard to tell to be honest. You've got; Spectral separation Pulfrich Lenticular or barrier screens Interference filter technology Eclipse method Polarization systems Anaglyph Majority use different classes, colours and types. Avatar falls under Polarization systems I believe. Stereoscopy or (Real3D). Anaglyph is the old red/green glasses, some are red/blue glasses, some are real effects without glasses. Most new 3D TV's are to be introduced without the need for glasses. 1
SimpleSi Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Most new 3D TV's are to be introduced without the need for glasses. cough - really Seen it working? regards Simon
ahuxham Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 cough - really Seen it working? regards Simon cough - yes. Not seen it working, perhaps google can help you on that one.
SimpleSi Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Sorry - what I mean is that I don't think its currently a true runner yet as laws of physics haven't been bent enough to give a 3D image you'd want to watch without glasses to your standard familiy living room with the chairs/sofas arranged in a 270 arc around the room I'm personally betting on a true 3D tech with a sort of tank arrangement with a fine mist or a solid cube with holographic material inside and lasers might do the job Google and marketing can sometimes conspire together regards Simon PS I'm still on a 50Hz CRT
ahuxham Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Sorry - what I mean is that I don't think its currently a true runner yet as laws of physics haven't been bent enough to give a 3D image you'd want to watch without glasses to your standard familiy living room with the chairs/sofas arranged in a 270 arc around the room I'm personally betting on a true 3D tech with a sort of tank arrangement with a fine mist or a solid cube with holographic material inside and lasers might do the job Google and marketing can sometimes conspire together regards Simon PS I'm still on a 50Hz CRT I think the technology overly relies on LED/LCD combinations project on two screens rather than one. I did see a showcase on either LG or Sony's website showing the principal behind the technology. This link for example: Sony Bravia 3DTV - First Look review - Pocket-lint The Sony one does this for example: "Back to Sony's 3DTV and the technology works by delivering two 1080p (Full HD) pictures simultaneously on the screen. To the naked eye it's a jumbled mess of imagery that you even after a couple of beers you would find hard to decode" Eeek, thats a glasses one, but the same glasses as Avatar
ahuxham Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 And I knew there was a working example of the technology. @ Harrods: High-definition TV in three dimensions – and no glasses - Times Online LG True 3-D TV So yes, there are true 3D TV's with no use of glasses, but obviously prototypes/display models at present.
dhicks Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Seen it working? Yes, there was a demo unit at BETT. The screen had some sort of lens over it which made for a 3D effect, no glasses needed. Unfortunatly I have no idea what company was selling this, or even where in BETT it was - I just remember walking around the corner and being surpised by the 3D screen, then thinking "gosh, bet that's expensive..." and then wandering off to look at something else. -- David Hicks
mattx Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 I suppose the 3D TV [ type ] which will take off will be the one that the Porn industry decides to go with. 1
ahuxham Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 I suppose the 3D TV [ type ] which will take off will be the one that the Porn industry decides to go with. Very true.
robk Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Yes, there was a demo unit at BETT. The screen had some sort of lens over it which made for a 3D effect, no glasses needed. Unfortunatly I have no idea what company was selling this, or even where in BETT it was - I just remember walking around the corner and being surpised by the 3D screen, then thinking "gosh, bet that's expensive..." and then wandering off to look at something else. -- David Hicks I seem to remember Stone had something like that above their enquiry desk. Reminded me of the old style 3d photos with a ridged overlay on it. Looked good, didn`t ask how much. Just thanked Jo for the large box of pens she had given me for the edugeek saturday freebies!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now