Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Got the 5 part XP one downloaded yesterday - not had chance to try it yet but it sounds simple enough :)

 

Is there any particular reason you had to break it up? It would be quite handy to have the part 1-5 links direct from the page listing them rather than having to click through to each page, click download, click back, click to next etc, if possible.

Posted

Well there are several reasons. Firstly it's easier for technicians on slower connections and secondly, my host limits maximum file sizes to 64MB (which is normal).

 

The other problem is some people just link directly to the download and not my website so I receive no hits. I provide the packages for free, so a small amount of publicity shouldn't be too much to ask :)

 

By all means, once you have the script and files, you can ZIP or RAR it into one large file.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
Well there are several reasons. Firstly it's easier for technicians on slower connections and secondly, my host limits maximum file sizes to 64MB (which is normal).

 

The other problem is some people just link directly to the download and not my website so I receive no hits. I provide the packages for free, so a small amount of publicity shouldn't be too much to ask :)

 

By all means, once you have the script and files, you can ZIP or RAR it into one large file.

 

No problems or complaints at all with the file splitting/need to unrar!

 

What I was trying to say wasn't "Could you link directly to the file" more "Is there a need to have an additional page for each single part of the download?". At the moment, you have to go main list -> part 1 page -> download <- list -> part 2 page etc, would having all 5 files linked to their http://www.logistixonline.com/index.php?pid=file&fileid=xx from the main list page for the XP patch set make a difference? Just handy if you can click down a list to grab all the parts without going back and forth :)

Edited by OutToLunch
Can't get rid of the auto url linky, arrrgh
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Trying to deploy the Google Earth MSI and getting

 

"Add Operation failed. Unable to extract deployment information from the package. Run validation on the package to make sure the package is correct"

 

Ive copied the whole folder across not the the MSI, any ideas?

 

Getting this on all the 2003 R2 and non R2 servers ive tried

Posted
Just a quick Q before I try it and break something - in the instructions, it mentions the PATHTOFIXES variable and setting this if the directory is different. Is it possible to just set this to . so the batch will run from anywhere or is there a specific reason you haven't done/couldn't do this?
Posted
Trying to deploy the Google Earth MSI and getting

 

I'll have a look at this for you this evening.

 

Is it possible to just set this to . so the batch will run from anywhere

 

How would you propose this works? I simply followed Microsoft's guidelines when I originally setup the files to script installation of multiple files. The single variable allows you to change it to a path of your choice, including UNC paths.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

How would you propose this works? I simply followed Microsoft's guidelines when I originally setup the files to script installation of multiple files. The single variable allows you to change it to a path of your choice, including UNC paths.

 

Sorry, just thinking of normal command line/batch conventions - . being the current directory, so running the install.bat batch file in the same folder ought to work as .\IE8-WindowsXP-x86-ENU.exe /quiet /passive /norestart instead of %PATHTOFIXES%\IE8-WindowsXP-x86-ENU.exe /quiet /passive /norestart on each line and make the installer portable rather than requiring editing. Happy to go off and break something trying it out myself to find out, just wondered if you'd already tried it like this with no joy :)

Posted

Seems to work fine - just REM'd out the SET line and did a search and replace on the rest...

 

REM set PATHTOFIXES=C:\logistixonline.com\XPSP3
TITLE Installing Microsoft Windows Internet Explorer 8
echo.
echo Installing IE8-WindowsXP-x86-ENU.exe...
.\IE8-WindowsXP-x86-ENU.exe /quiet /passive /norestart
echo.
TITLE Installing Windows Media Player 11
echo.
echo Installing Windows Media Player 11 Part 1...
.\wmfdist11.exe /quiet /passive /norestart
echo.
echo Installing Windows Media Player 11 Part 2... 
.\wmp11.exe /quiet /passive /norestart
echo.
echo Installing WindowsXP-KB941569-x86-ENU.EXE... 
.\WindowsXP-KB941569-x86-ENU.EXE /quiet /passive
echo.
TITLE Installing Microsoft Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool v2.14
echo.
echo Installing windows-kb890830-v2.14.exe...
.\windows-kb890830-v2.14.exe /quiet

 

Working from flash drive, locally and network drive - haven't tested with a UNC path yet though.

Posted
Let me know if it works OK with UNC paths

 

DOS doesn't like UNC paths very much in a variety of circumstances. It is good practice to put this right at the start of any batch file that references files in the same or sub-folders:

 

pushd %~sdp0

 

If you want to get back to wherever you were, make this the last command:

 

popd

 

The pushd line changes the working-directory to the folder where the batch file lives, and if that happens to be a UNC path then it (necessarily) maps a temporary drive letter there first.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
DOS doesn't like UNC paths very much in a variety of circumstances. It is good practice to put this right at the start of any batch file that references files in the same or sub-folders:

 

Now that's a nifty bit of old school batching :)

Posted
Trying to deploy the Google Earth MSI and getting

 

"Add Operation failed. Unable to extract deployment information from the package. Run validation on the package to make sure the package is correct"

 

Ive copied the whole folder across not the the MSI, any ideas?

 

Getting this on all the 2003 R2 and non R2 servers ive tried

 

I raised this in this post back in July.

 

http://www.edugeek.net/forums/windows/38756-logistix-update-packs-july09.html

 

It still doesn't work for me with the same error for the September update.

 

GJE

Posted
I've also uploaded the latest Google Earth 5.1, released September 9th. Looks the same on the surface, but I'm sure there must be some differences. The file size is much larger than Google Earth 5.0 :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...