Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have my on prem cnMaestro up and running in it's initial state....

 

Things that I noted on mysetup so far.

  • Had to convert to Hyper-V .VMDX files using Starwind V2V. - On start up of the VM on the Hyper-V console after a few seconds of a blinking cursor I just get a blank screen... No setup, nothing.  It was however claiming an IP address from DHCP and using a web browser I could connect to the WebUI.  Need to see if I can SSH to the box or something if need be?
  • I initially got 'Cookies Missing' when entering my Cambium ID and Onboard Key, but I used the link to login in the Anchor account again, changed the onboard key to something else, saved and tried again.  After a short while it seemed to sort itself out and let me do the initial password setup, name, etc.
  • It looks slightly different from the version we have in the Cloud.  I know On Prem is 6.0.0., and cloud is 6.2.0 - icons are slightly different.  But then noticed in the Administration > Settings > General - the account view defaults to 'Access and Backhau'l whereas it should just be on 'Enterprise'.  Set that, and all looks the same.
  • You need to import the WLANs first and then followed by the AP Groups in the 'Shared Settings > Wi-Fi Profiles' - but these seemed to have come across ok
  • I've not 'adopted' any APs just yet, that's the next step but I need to RTFM before I jump in too much as this stage. 

Just comparing side by side now before I move on to the next step, but that won't be until early next week for me now.

 

Pete

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, smarties11 said:

 

I think the insurmountable issue here is ongoing compliance.

 

A local controller will solve the immediate problem of the cloud controller going dark, but how long will it be before a security vulnerability is discovered in either the controller itself or the WAP firmware? If that vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 7.0 or higher, there goes any realistic chance of maintaining Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus accreditation.

 

Unless there is a buy out from a competitor I don't see how schools will be able to continue with this solution for anything more than a stop gap.

 

Out of interest, how many others are in the same position as me, having had a brand-new Cambium deployment installed as recently as August? I'm massively regretting not sticking with Ruckus now 😭

We're in the same position, but we're struggling configuring it to a decent standard. No support available and we're shooting in the dark. Unusable in most of the building.

Posted
1 hour ago, Andycat said:

We're in the same position, but we're struggling configuring it to a decent standard. No support available and we're shooting in the dark. Unusable in most of the building.

 

Oh no 😞 Our experience on the deployment side has been really positive. And it's performing really well. But that's not much use if the whole ecosystem is shelved 😞

 

Is there anything I can help with? Could it be interference - have you scaled back your radio power at all. Redway recommended the following for us (with an AP in each classroom)

- 2.4ghz - 8 to 14dBm, 20Mhz channel width

- 5ghz - 11 to 17dBm, 40Mhz channel width (with channels 144 and 165 turned off)

- 6ghz - 12 to 18dBm, 80Mhz channel width

Posted
8 minutes ago, smarties11 said:

 

Oh no 😞 Our experience on the deployment side has been really positive. And it's performing really well. But that's not much use if the whole ecosystem is shelved 😞

 

Is there anything I can help with? Could it be interference - have you scaled back your radio power at all. Redway recommended the following for us (with an AP in each classroom)

- 2.4ghz - 8 to 14dBm, 20Mhz channel width

- 5ghz - 11 to 17dBm, 40Mhz channel width (with channels 144 and 165 turned off)

- 6ghz - 12 to 18dBm, 80Mhz channel width

We'll give it  a try thanks!

Posted

Just seen that too, that's something a bit more positive to wake up to today and hopefully means I get a bit of sleep this weekend ;)

Reassuring news that they are planning to release a non-anchored version if any rescue/buyout fails.

Posted

What virtual spec are people using? I know the instructions show the recommendation but we don;t push any authentication through cnMaestro so really only need management.

 

Looking to host in Azure but don't want to spend too much monthly on it

Posted

Managed to get the local controller setup, profiles imported only losing the ability to use Microsoft365 for BYOD sign in.  Exported a list of AP's S/N all other information going to test an AP import. 
but in the FAQ
What happens if Anchor is discontinued or disconnected?
cnMaestro on-premises will continue to work, but you will not be able to add or delete any devices.
If the Enterprise business is acquired by an entity, they will guide you at that time.
"If not, we plan to release an on-premises image for Wi-Fi and Switches only, without any dependency on the Cloud Anchor or licenses."


This bit would be an issue if we cannot add to on-prem without the anchor or delete from the cloud version after the 1st. Also is the "on-premises image for Wi-Fi and Switches only, without any dependency on the Cloud Anchor or licenses" is this going to be upgrade to the local one we are advised to setup? or another install instance. Not used the on prem one for over 4 years when I moved it to the cloud.   I guess its wait for more information.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...