Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is there anything we can do to stop the amount of obvious false positives from Smoothwall's reporting? No skin from my nose, however the facial features of our DSL are wearing down rapidly! ;)

Good examples are Worlde & related sites which often preload large wordlists containing just about everything under the sun to warrant Smoothwall to throw a teenager sized hissy fit, one for each safeguarding category!

 

 

falsepos.png

Posted

On a local Smoothwall you can mark stuff as excluded.  Just find the entry and hover over it, an exclude button should appear at the far right.

Not sure if that is possible on cloud filter.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, TechMonkey said:

On a local Smoothwall you can mark stuff as excluded.  Just find the entry and hover over it, an exclude button should appear at the far right.

Not sure if that is possible on cloud filter.

 

Aha, that's the bit - an area I've not played with before! :)

https://kb.smoothwall.com/hc/en-us/articles/360008197280-Exclusions-from-the-Safeguarding-Full-Report-and-Alerts

Cheers!

(This is why it often pays to pop a quick post on here to people who use it, than bother the support team for a simple question :) )

Posted
1 hour ago, synaesthesia said:

Thanks, I wish I'd thought of that before posting ;) - not really much need for that was there?

 

its actually the best way :) apologies for it coming across rude.

Reason why I said what I said was its going to improve the product for us all if everyone created a support ticket for these "overblocking" alerts.

Posted

I spoke with Chris who runs our digital safety team yesterday - he was working on improving these false positives where sites have javascript lists with every naughty word under the sun (my favourite is the list of words you cant have on the back of a real madrid shirt). As such, I suspect this will improve real soon.

  • Like 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, gaz350b said:

 

its actually the best way :) apologies for it coming across rude.

Reason why I said what I said was its going to improve the product for us all if everyone created a support ticket for these "overblocking" alerts.

No worries, understood - I suspect it just shows more that the person logging the ticket has a lack of knowledge, true in my case! ;)

1 minute ago, tom_newton said:

I spoke with Chris who runs our digital safety team yesterday - he was working on improving these false positives where sites have javascript lists with every naughty word under the sun (my favourite is the list of words you cant have on the back of a real madrid shirt). As such, I suspect this will improve real soon.

Now you can't say something like that without people wanting to dig in further! I'm off to google what you can't have on the back of a Real Madrid shirt ;)

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...