sigma Posted June 8 Posted June 8 https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/06/08/motor-insurance-frausters-abusing-ai-to-exaggerate-claims/5252024
jthompson Posted June 12 Posted June 12 Interesting discussion on how best to counter the accelerating accumulation of wealth by AI billionaires. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/06/bernie-sanders-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund-plan.html
sigma Posted July 16 Posted July 16 https://nysfocus.com/2026/07/14/new-york-humanoid-robot-teacher-salamanca-school-district Quote The classroom marks a new venture for Realbotix, a Toronto-based robotics company formerly known as Tokens.com, that helped customers use cryptocurrency to rent “digital land” in the Metaverse. In April 2024, the company acquired Simulcra, the Las Vegas parent company behind RealDoll, which has spent decades creating hyperrealistic sex dolls and later expanded into sex robots that remain on the market today. Further comment from the author: Quote I am not here to shame sex robots. That's not the point. The point is design lineage. A "teacher" robot built by a company whose core embodiment expertise is companion and sex robots is going to carry that design logic into the classroom, whether anyone intends it or not. Look at how Sally is described: "lifelike appearance," silicone skin, long brown hair, an adult woman's likeness. That's not a neutral pedagogical choice. That's the same narrow, hyperfeminine embodiment template Realbotix has been refining for its companion products, repurposed for kids. Quote
sigma Posted July 27 Posted July 27 https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/claude-chats-publicly- Quote A trove of chat logs and projects created with Anthropic’s Claude — some including sensitive personal and company information — have been left exposed to Google, making them them searchable to anyone on the web. The artifacts appear to have been made public when Claude users opted to distribute a given chat or project to colleagues or associates using the chatbot’s “share” feature. After hitting a “share” button in the top right corner, Claude notes that sharing will create a “public” link, and “anyone with the link can view.” The warning, though, doesn’t alert users that shared content could wind up being indexed by a search engine — meaning that a user could effectively be sharing their Claude-generated document with the entire internet. Some of the artifacts exposed to the web and indexed by Google, such as personal websites and some vibe-coded apps, appear to have been created for public consumption. But much of the discoverable content was likely intended to be shared internally at a company, or between a small handful of people. Such artifacts, which were reviewed by Futurism by way of Google Search, included what appeared to be a detailed medical report of a real patient, clinical trial results that included patient names, documents sharing the names and phone numbers of primary school-aged children, company documents marked for internal use only, and employee reviews that included personal information about workers.
6Foot2 Posted July 28 Posted July 28 Link: Search engines fix Claude leak but Perplexity users’ files still online Quote AI giant Anthropic, along with search engines Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo, de-indexed a major leak of personal information from Claude customers today. However, those same search engines forgot to take down a similar, inadvertent data dump from customers of another AI service, Perplexity. Perplexity, which charges for Computer access, was last valued at $20 billion and has tens of millions of active users. This morning, Protos was able to access dozens of full Perplexity Computer files from assorted customers, simply by querying Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo using the standard URL structure for shareable links. We’ve reported the bug to Perplexity and the three search engines...
DalekSec Posted July 28 Posted July 28 QA (Training Provider) Are providing AI Apprenticeships on behalf of the government for free (If your company pays into the Government Apprenticeship Levy) . I've signed up to do the level 4, which is a 12 month course. https://www.qa.com/apprenticeships/ai/ai-automation-specialist-level-4/ Might be worth others looking into if their eligible also, there are multiple levels, another guy here is doing the level 6. 1
Ditto Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 (edited) From what a 30 second said, less than 2 percent of employers pay in to the levy. What I have found with other similar offerings, the fact that I am part time precluded me from taking advantage of gov funded training. The model needs to broaden it's reach. Does your access come a result of being employed by a large public sector organisation? Edited July 28 by Ditto
Ditto Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 A little more digging shows the NHS is the biggest contributor. My job is around 50% funded by the NHS, but I am not an NHS employee. I wonder if there is an angle in...
Ditto Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 Turns out I am mistaken on needing to be a employee of a contributing company, but the 30 hours rule kills it for me again!
DalekSec Posted July 28 Posted July 28 10 minutes ago, Ditto said: From what a 30 second said, les than 2 percent of employers pay in to the levy. What I have found with other similar offerings, the fact that I am part time precluded me from taking advantage of gov funded training. The model needs to broaden it's reach. Does your access come a result of being employed by a large public sector organisation? I work for a SMB, roughly 350 employees, we do pay into the levy.
Ditto Posted July 28 Author Posted July 28 (edited) 6 minutes ago, DalekSec said: I work for a SMB, roughly 350 employees, we do pay into the levy. Interesting, I wonder if your employer is unusual or my early Google/Ai searches are misleading - wouldn't be the first time 😂 I have learnt that there is a scheme where we could potentially request a NHS Levy transfer from the trust we have a contract with. Combining that with new 'Short Apprenticeship Units' might be possible. However, it looks as though there would need to employer contribution too, and in 6 years they have not spent a single penny on my training and development. Recently a task came up and I had to say, sorry, I know something that would work, but the training I request 2 years ago was blocked so I don't have the skills to implement. It's so frustrating! Edited July 28 by Ditto
6Foot2 Posted August 4 Posted August 4 Link: AI cheating scandal rocks Mexico’s most prestigious university | CNN Quote ... UNAM annulled thousands of tests after results showed an unusually high number of perfect scores, suggesting some students cheated either through using artificial intelligence tools or by obtaining the questions in advance...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now