Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Wanting to pick everybodys brains on this one - Is there any point in running more than 1 Domain Controller if I only have a single host server running VM's? To my knowledge the only reason you would run 2 / 3 DC's is if you have multiple hosts for redundancy.. although some threads i have read state otherwise & that it is always best practice to run 2 DC', even if you only have the 1 host. I'm guessing this is to take into account for corrupted DC's / VM corruption? Although I suppose this wouldn't matter too much if you have good backups?
Posted

Even with 1 host I'd run 2 DC's. Just in case one VM goes kaput you don't have any downtime

 

Ideally 2 hosts 2 DCs, but if for budget reasons this isn't possible then 1 host 2 DCs

Posted (edited)
Even with 1 host I'd run 2 DC's. Just in case one VM goes kaput you don't have any downtime

 

Ideally 2 hosts 2 DCs, but if for budget reasons this isn't possible then 1 host 2 DCs

 

I think I will spin up another DC, even with backups it’s better to be safe than sorry I suppose!

 

We have 2 HP ProLiant DL380’s which I’m just about ready to retire which have been in service since 2015.. Consolidated a lot of stuff down & also have way less VM’s now after decluttering.

 

Got a Poweredge 760XS with a 7 year next business day warranty as a replacement.

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

2 on 1 host won’t help with hardware redundancy but will help if something happens to the guest operating system.

 

Yea if some hardware goes kerput it makes no difference.. SLT are aware of the downtime possibility though so that’s that!

Edited by Olliedawg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...