Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Morning,

 

Do you have your Hyper-V hosts as standalone devices, or in their own domain? Obviously their own domain means setting up another domain just for them, but it does enable live migrations. I appreciate we're not constantly moving servers from host to host, but it is handy at times!

 

Stuart

Posted
Both my hosts on the school domain.

 

This is not the recommended, and anyone who has been hit by a ransomware attack will tell you why.........

Posted

For sites with clusters, own domain ALWAYS!!!!

 

Please don't be tempted to add them to the 'Production' domain, when something goes wrong you've multiplied your problems.

 

If it's a single host then just standalone, no domain and firewall enabled.

Posted

Yep, they do. You speak to any security people and the recommendation is absolutely not to though. If you get hit by something, you'll believe MS are wrong in this advice as well.

 

If there weren't bad people in the world then 100% domain join your hosts.

Posted (edited)

This is why I'm not in love with failover clusters: I always feel as though the benefits of them are massively outweighed by the complexity, and that there's always a single point of failure anyway.

 

We've supplemented ours with a DC on a standalone Hyper-V host.

Edited by jthompson
Posted

Separate Forest if you have more than one host. Name it like SCH-HVDomain.

 

Also the same with Vcentre , no ties to Production AD. Separate Creds and on mgmt vlan

Posted

We have 3 hosts that live on their own domain, a DC on each in HV (a .internal domain)

The production servers then live in Failover Cluster Manager on their own domain.

 

We could lose 2/3 hosts and still get by. Hugely overkill for a school though

  • Thanks 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

Just reviving this as looking myself at moving to Hyper V. Seen both approaches before now (domain-joined hosts and joined-to-separate-internal-domain-running-the-virtual-dcs approach.) Not decided which way I'm going here, tempted for it to be the latter if I have to decide though. Will be two hosts I'd think.

 

Can you get replication and migration working though if both hosts are just standalone? As in, just workgroup only?

Edited by JRA
Posted

This page seems to suggest that the nodes will need to be members of the same AD domain - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/failover-clustering/create-failover-cluster#verify-the-prerequisites

Make sure that all servers that you want to add as cluster nodes are joined to the same Active Directory domain.

 

Also, cluster-aware updating (CAU) requires that the nodes are joined to the same AD domain.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Thanks for that. Wonder if there's any merit in non-cluster, just letting them replicate every 5 mins if I can, then seeing what I can leverage Veeam to do. Will have a read on that, not sure if Veeam can do migration even. Although if so it's nearing the same amount of setup then as the dedicate mini-domain approach.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...