Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Palm oil is the prime cause of the endangered status of the orangutan. So, ignoring your rather odd use of italics on the word "linked", I would say that people who are complaining have a point.

 

I'd prefer no £20 note rather than killing off more orangutans.

 

Sorry - yes, this I get. Apologies if I've been misunderstood.

 

My point is - surely there's a way to produce palm oil that doesn't endanger orangutans. Just because something has a history like that doesn't mean it can't be produced without further endangerment.

Edited by korifugi
beterrer terminology
Posted

I think the Bank of England is making a point. There are difficult decisions around the use of any material. The new notes are not biodegradable for example and could in theory be a pollution problem - most people won't be littering the countryside with tenners so it's unlikely to be an issue.

 

The ingredients used to make the notes also have ethical decisions. My guess is that they're testing public opinion... where are we on half a cow versus an area of rainforest being chopped down?

 

Personally, I think half a cow has less impact environmentally

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...