Steve21 Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 Morning All, I'm not sure if I'm just missing an obvious or not, but recently received this email from our LEA and not sure whether to believe this or not: All UK organisations must comply with the Data Protection Act when sending client personal-sensitive confidential information from a standard email address which isn’t protected by any technical encryption measures whilst in transit, so that it can’t be intercepted, read or altered by unintended recipients. To ensure compliance with the Data Protection Act 1988 and the privacy of the client ,any emails which contain person-sensitive confidential information must be sent via secure email solutions, or at the very least have a strong password applied to attached documents containing personal information. Arrangements can be made to share passwords under separate cover subject to sender / recipient identity verification. Based on that, doesn't it basically say if it's encrypted you don't need to password protected any documents anymore? But what happens if the encrypted email gets sent to the wrong person, and they as the "valid recipient" (from the emails point of view) decrypt it and read it? Isn't that still a breach? Steve
FN-GM Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 It would be a breach if it gets sent to the wrong person. The same way it would be if they get posted to the wrong address. Please can I have a source for that passage please? It would be very handy. Thanks
Steve21 Posted December 3, 2015 Author Posted December 3, 2015 So basically useless LEA email, and keep using passworded documents At least that way if it's sent to wrong person, and password is given over phone etc the one who received it wrong won't be able to access it. It's from an email so no idea where it's from originally or whether they made the phrasing themselves. Steve
FN-GM Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 Are password protected documents secure? Our insurance company say not and will not cover us in there is a loss of data from a password protected document.
Steve21 Posted December 3, 2015 Author Posted December 3, 2015 Are password protected documents secure? Our insurance company say not and will not cover us in there is a loss of data from a password protected document. According to ICO "Consider whether the content of the email should be encrypted or password protected" How else can you send information over email if not? As obviously not everyone has SecureNet etc Steve
aleach2 Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 We basically add any sensitive data to an encrypted Zip file using 7zip and set a huge password. We then send the email to the recipient and have a challenge and response system where they will have to phone the person who sent the email and give details regarding the content of the email and then we release the password to them. Works pretty well.
aleach2 Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 We also have a procedure for sending fax communications but that happens very little these days.
Steve21 Posted December 3, 2015 Author Posted December 3, 2015 Aye that's what I assumed aleach, but just seems a lot of the "recommendations" disagree with that now and "encryption" is all you need to do. Another example from the FCA in their guidelines: https://fca.org.uk/static/documents/data-protection-guide-external.pdf Scanned copy attached to an email, or in text of an email Send the email to a specific person rather than a group or team email address. If particularly sensitive, you must encrypt the email. You should check that the information has arrived. Please note, emails from Blackberries cannot be encrypted Nothing about passwording it anymore Steve
jdoyle Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 "The Act does not define “appropriate”. But it does say that an assessment of the appropriate security measures in a particular case should consider technological developments and the costs involved. The Act does not require you to have state-of-the-art security technology to protect the personal data you hold, but you should regularly review your security arrangements as technology advances. As we have said, there is no “one size fits all” solution to information security, and the level of security you choose should depend on the risks to your organisation." https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/principle-7-security/
Marshall_IT Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 Everyone should now be able to get free e-mail encryption by using Office 365 so i'd say that it is no long valid to argue it's not reasonable to have encrypted e-mail.
Steve21 Posted December 3, 2015 Author Posted December 3, 2015 Everyone should now be able to get free e-mail encryption by using Office 365 so i'd say that it is no long valid to argue it's not reasonable to have encrypted e-mail. Aye but as I said that doesn't stop someone receiving an email incorrectly and viewing all your data thus causing a breach End of day all you need is access to the email account the email was sent to and you have all the data then. Steve
Marshall_IT Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 No that's true, but you can have all the security in the world and that still wont stop you from having a breech, it's the human condition to make mistakes. It's just when legislation states you should take all reasonable steps to reduce risk, you need to take them. Encrypted email used to be difficult to set up, SMBs didn't' always have the expertise to do that, that's reasonable. It used to be expensive, that's reasonable. Those 2 things are no longer true. So now, IMO, not having encrypted email means you haven't taken all reasonable steps to secure your communications.
aleach2 Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 No that's true, but you can have all the security in the world and that still wont stop you from having a breech, it's the human condition to make mistakes. It's just when legislation states you should take all reasonable steps to reduce risk, you need to take them. Encrypted email used to be difficult to set up, SMBs didn't' always have the expertise to do that, that's reasonable. It used to be expensive, that's reasonable. Those 2 things are no longer true. So now, IMO, not having encrypted email means you haven't taken all reasonable steps to secure your communications. True, as long as you can prove you have taken adequate steps to protect the data by having policy, procedure and training as well as risk assessments then the ICO will be happy enough that you have put in place “appropriate" protection measures.
nathan Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 Everyone should now be able to get free e-mail encryption by using Office 365 so i'd say that it is no long valid to argue it's not reasonable to have encrypted e-mail. have you any more information on setting this up or actually using it?
Marshall_IT Posted December 3, 2015 Posted December 3, 2015 have you any more information on setting this up or actually using it? I have a blog entry on here on how i have set it up. It's pretty easy to use from both ends. In fact, it's seemless for staff here apart from having to put ENCRYPT at the start of the subject-line. Office 365 E-mail Encryption - Blogs - EduGeek.net
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now