Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As far as I can see, it fails on at least 2 of the patentability requirements!

 

1. It isn't novel.

2. It's obvious - it makes use of primary school level physics - ie pointing lights at a white background...

 

So, yeah, this is nonsense. Entirely unenforceable too. How can anyone prove that someone else used this set-up to take a photo?

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
Don't photographs against a seamless white background from now on unless you have asked Amazon for permission first?

No (because that's not what they are patenting).

 

They're patenting a specific machine (a combination of apparatuses in extremely particular configurations). Not "taking a photo with a white background". A studio layout with a front light and four rear lights at specific heights to a platform with specific angles and intensities, a specific f-stop, and specific ISO.

 

The question of whether it should be patentable is easy – yes, it’s okay to patent a configuration of machines. (Source)

 

uTCmmagNKWP5.png

 

iLSIPYmUTBkc.png

Edited by Arthur
Posted
Quick. Someone also patent a shadow dancing really badly to a primary colour background... They they are really buggered ;)
Posted
Prior art solutions for achieving such a result for capturing images and/or video of objects set against a true white background include solutions that often involve some type of image retouching, post processing, “green screen” techniques, or other special effects and image and video manipulation to achieve the result of an object set against a true white background.

 

Because adding a Levels layer is a really advanced technique :confused:

Posted (edited)

Much as a I dislike this sort of thing, I actually think they have a point. They're trying to patent their 'secret sauce' for their style of product-shot lighting, rather than the concepts - which let's face it, are not novel. I've got quite a few studio lights myself and a fair idea of what I'm doing. Amazon have worked out the lighting profiles, ratios and angles - quite precise - which they use as a standard for their product shots and they've described them in a patent.

 

However, I've found a loophole in case you wanted to emulate exactly the Amazon shooting style.

The patent describes the workflow.

shot1.png

 

If you switch on the FRONT lights before the REAR lights, you've worked around the patent. Ta-da!! I thank you.

Edited by jinnantonnixx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...