Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
According to a tweet from sky news they doubt it was a soldier…

 

ahh good old sky news, always a reliable source of informed, unbiased "journalism"

 

that aside

the incident itself is terrible, i do hope that catch the person

Edited by ConradJones
Posted
MOD haven't confirmed if they were a soldier or not so could be anyone. Another theory is that he was targeted due to a Help for Heroes shirt.
Posted

Unbelievable!

 

http://i.imgur.com/kC4UP84.jpg

 

Apparently this is what happened...

 

  • Two black men run over a white man in a car, then get out of the car and start chopping his head off with a meat cleaver.
  • People were asking why, they replied, "We've just had enough."
  • Woolwich police turn up, but have to wait for firearms officers.
  • Firearms officers turn up
  • Men approach firearms officers wielding a meat cleaver each and a 'rusty-looking' revolver
  • One man (no gun) approaches firearms officers, gets shot.
  • Second man (gun) tries to fire the gun at firearms officers, it backfires in his hand, blowing his finger off
  • Firearms officers shoot second man.

Posted
BBC Breakfast News has just confirmed that the guy who was attacked was a member of the armed services [No other details supplied]
Posted
Unbelievable!

 

http://i.imgur.com/kC4UP84.jpg

 

Apparently this is what happened...

 

  • Two black men run over a white man in a car, then get out of the car and start chopping his head off with a meat cleaver.
  • People were asking why, they replied, "We've just had enough."
  • Woolwich police turn up, but have to wait for firearms officers.
  • Firearms officers turn up
  • Men approach firearms officers wielding a meat cleaver each and a 'rusty-looking' revolver
  • One man (no gun) approaches firearms officers, gets shot.
  • Second man (gun) tries to fire the gun at firearms officers, it backfires in his hand, blowing his finger off
  • Firearms officers shoot second man.

 

 

You miss the steps where several women tried to to protect the slaughtered man in the road, and another remonstrated with one of the murderers telling him that "there are many of us, and few of you, you will lose" or something to that effect.

 

Plus there is a 20 minute gap between the attack the police doing anything.

 

I don't think anyone should call this terrorism - it should be called insanity as only the insane could do this sort of thing.

Posted (edited)

Absolutely - insanity rather than terrorism

One little thing worried me - on the radio someone commented that the attackers were of "muslim appearance". What on earth does that mean? How can a religion have an appearance.

The guy I saw on TV was a black guy who was of "African appearance" if anything - and he sounded VERY english (he even said "our troops" at one point)

 

Interested in what @localzuk said about people trying to protect the guy - I wondered why noone seemed to do anything much - I wondered if it was because it was all so quick.

I wonder what the woman standing in front of the guy ranting, holding a cleaver and with blood dripping off his hands, was thinking

 

* @DeltaBravo Surely it is terrible for this to be done to ANYONE?

Edited by witch
Posted
Absolutely - insanity rather than terrorism

One little thing worried me - on the radio someone commented that the attackers were of "muslim appearance". What on earth does that mean? How can a religion have an appearance.

The guy I saw on TV was a black guy who was of "African appearance" if anything - and he sounded VERY english (he even said "our troops" at one point)

 

That was the description given to officials by the police, who then passed it on to the media. So, potentially, it could be some proof of "institutional racism"...

 

Interested in what @localzuk said about people trying to protect the guy - I wondered why noone seemed to do anything much - I wondered if it was because it was all so quick.

 

I don't think it was all particularly quick! The initial murder was quick, from eye-witness reports, but then they stood around ranting for 20 minutes until the armed police arrived and shot them. I'd hazard a guess that it would be a mix between shock and the whole "bystander effect" whereby people don't do anything because they think other people will be dealing with it.

Posted

I meant that actual attack was quick which is why no one actually tried to stop them.

 

It appalls me that the police could describe someone who is other than chalk white as "of muslim appearance" unless they were wearing a burkha or a sign. Definitely institutional racism.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Not to ruin the butter on everyones bread, but...

 

If this was a 'religious attack', it is in all honesty, nothing new. Muslims and Christians have been at 'war' since the dawn of time, and it won't stop, ever. They'll just be more, and more, and more bloodshed.

 

If it wasn't a religious attack, then there is something terribly wrong with our education system.

 

R.I.P To the helpless soldier.

Edited by Sunnyknight
Posted
He looks like Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction. I suspect the media is jumping to the wrong conclusions, this is just a conversation about burgers gone horribly wrong.
Posted
Not to ruin the butter on everyones bread, but...

 

If this was a 'religious attack', it is in all honesty, nothing new. Muslims and Christians have been at 'war' since the dawn of time, and it won't stop, ever. They'll just be more, and more, and more bloodshed.

 

If it wasn't a religious attack, then there is something terribly wrong with our education system.

 

R.I.P To the helpless soldier.

 

I have to agree somewhat, on the video of him ranting he talks about getting rid of our government and getting rid of the troops in afghanistan. Both are fair points. and before you jump on me no i do not condone beheadings in the street. but if this draws attention to how corrupt the govt are and have been over iraq / afghanistan / syria and anywhere else you care to name then good, its about time people in this country paid attention to what their govt is doing in their name instead of saying "oh politics, that's boring, i don't care"

Posted

As much as this is a big news story, and I feel for the soldier and his family, I can't help having the feeling that this is being over played by the media and government. Just why did David Cameron cut his EU meeting short and convene and emergency COBRA meeting? Everyone seems to have jumped on the "terrorist" band wagon just a little too quickly if you ask me.

 

Seriously, shocking as the act was, would you jump up and down and say Al-Queda, or would you say a couple of nut jobs with a beef against the government?

 

The other thing that got me was the police taking 20mins to arrive!?! Probably too busy terrorising motorists to respond to a murder in progress?

Posted (edited)

Imagine the outcry if it was a Muslim man that was the victim on the street.

 

Britain is a very strange country sometimes.

Edited by zag
  • Thanks 1
Posted
I have to agree somewhat, on the video of him ranting he talks about getting rid of our government and getting rid of the troops in afghanistan. Both are fair points. and before you jump on me no i do not condone beheadings in the street. but if this draws attention to how corrupt the govt are and have been over iraq / afghanistan / syria and anywhere else you care to name then good, its about time people in this country paid attention to what their govt is doing in their name instead of saying "oh politics, that's boring, i don't care"

 

You say you don't condone beheadings in the street, but in the next breath you say if this has had the desired effect then that's a good thing... talk about conflicting statements!

 

Whilst I do agree that people should take more notice of what exactly their government gets up to instead of reading all their opinions in the newspapers, I vehemently disagree that any good can come from murdering an innocent (in this or any other case).

  • Thanks 1
Posted
As much as this is a big news story, and I feel for the soldier and his family, I can't help having the feeling that this is being over played by the media and government. Just why did David Cameron cut his EU meeting short and convene and emergency COBRA meeting? Everyone seems to have jumped on the "terrorist" band wagon just a little too quickly if you ask me.

 

Seriously, shocking as the act was, would you jump up and down and say Al-Queda, or would you say a couple of nut jobs with a beef against the government?

 

The other thing that got me was the police taking 20mins to arrive!?! Probably too busy terrorising motorists to respond to a murder in progress?

 

The questions that need asking, and why COBRA would be convened, are:

 

Is this an isolated incident?

Is this a new modus opperandi of a larger 'group', or a lone couple of nutters?

What are the repercussions of this to the wider country? (Mosque attacks, far right taking more of a handle-hold etc...)

Should the threat level in the country be increased?

Did the intelligence services know about these guys?

Was it specifically targeted at this guy, or the military as a whole?

 

So, it completely makes sense for the government to make an issue of it. If they didn't, and there are more attacks today, then the media would blame them for not having done it...

Posted
Imagine the outcry if it was a Muslim man that was the victim on the street.

 

Britain is a very strange country sometimes.

 

What, you mean like this one. Nope, I didn't catch that saturating coverage on all the news channels either.

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)
You say you don't condone beheadings in the street, but in the next breath you say if this has had the desired effect then that's a good thing... talk about conflicting statements!

 

Whilst I do agree that people should take more notice of what exactly their government gets up to instead of reading all their opinions in the newspapers, I vehemently disagree that any good can come from murdering an innocent (in this or any other case).

 

I understand i've contradicted myself there, i don't mean good that the bloke is dead, obviously it's a horrible situation for his family etc. but as demonstrated by a conversation i had with someone this morning people generally haven't got a clue about foreign policy and the nature of terrorism, they read the papers and watch the news but haven't actually got a clue about what's going on. If you talk about the CIA funding bin laden & "al-quaeda" in the 70s people look at you like you have 3 heads and you're on the side of the "terrorists" because they have such a closed minded view of the world and don't want to accept that governments are sh*ts.

 

We (the west) kill hundreds of civillians every week in the middle east and people are up in arms when it happens here. If you want to be a warmongering nation then you should accept that it's not all give there has to be some take aswell in the form of casualties, it's not a nice thing to say it's not a point people will agree with but while we're killing civillians we should at least expect that "they" will do the same to us. It also doesn't help when govts are saying "right this group in this country are freedom fighters but this group in another country are terrorists." One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter

Edited by Pyroman
Posted
I meant that actual attack was quick which is why no one actually tried to stop them.

 

It appalls me that the police could describe someone who is other than chalk white as "of muslim appearance" unless they were wearing a burkha or a sign. Definitely institutional racism.

 

theres no such thing as black and white, only shades of brown!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...