Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I aired my views on this sort of "art" before so won't go into that, but if the "artist" has indeed got illegal files on there, surely they are open to prosecution.

Or would a picture entitled "man molesting a 5 year old" simply be classified as art despite the content itself being illegal?

Posted
How many bets if someone tries to bust them it is actually empty. Either way I would say it is crud. Maybe if he had done something with the pedestal, or the case I would have to think for a second, but this is someone trying to be a smart ass. What ever your thoughts on graffiti this is no where in the same bracket.
Posted

anything can be art, dependent on the viewer, so the 'ist it art?' question is redundant

 

However, I think it's a load of old tripe ;)

Posted
errr, no. to my mind art is something visual, and that is just a hard drive. if they had actually pasted printed images of the contents on the outside of the case. then that would have constituted art in my oppinion.
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Or would a picture entitled "man molesting a 5 year old" simply be classified as art despite the content itself being illegal?

 

Yes. From a legal standpoint at least. However, only in some countries.

 

Here, I'm not 100% on the legalities. I vaguely remember a few things that may or may not be true. This is based off of a child protection course/meeting from a while back.

 

From a moral standpoint, it wouldn't make it into a gallery. At all. Ever.

Posted
Did you read the article?

 

:troll:

 

Yes, but that was a direct reply to MK-2 regarding the situation he proposed.

 

[/keeping calm, like a boss]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...