jthompson

Your GPRESULT output is displaying what the User COnfig side is up to. I'd recommend running gpresult -h C:\temp\gpres.htm And opening the output file to look for further clues.

It's interesting that you mention varnish, as I wondered whether a gloss finish would work. I found a gloss varnish worked well with my AdMech. For most of the models I've applied a gloss varnish over the whole thing, apart from the cloth areas, and then gone over everything with Lahmian medium to dial the gloss effect back where needed. As well as giving a bit more depth to the look, it also makes the paintwork much more resistant to scratches and sweaty fingers. I guess they might get a bit shiny over time if the medium gets worn off, but that can be re-added easily enough.

I really like the detail on the gems. They look nice and glassy.

This section The following GPOs were not applied because they were filtered out ------------------------------------------------------------------- Local Group Policy Filtering: Not Applied (Empty) is fine, as its just referring to the local group policy. It's this section Applied Group Policy Objects ----------------------------- N/A which should list all the GPOs for your user configuration. Do you know if you've got loopback processing in place on any of the GPOs applied to the computer(s)? I've a feeling that that might cause those GPOs to win out over your user GPOs.

That looks promising in that is suggests that there's still an exchange going on between clients and DCs. Is there anything else on the end of that error message? Might be worth checking that your GPO links are actually enabled where you have them linked to OUs, and that the 'GPO Status' option on affected GPOs is set to 'Enabled' (i.e. you've not got user and/or computer settings disabled where you don't want them to be). It would be strange that that would get switched in bulk by accident, but worth checking in the same way that one might check that something is plugged in. From the look of that error message, though, it might be the 'Security filtering' that's creating the issue.

The big earthworks/constuction site in the background does rather suggest itself as a cause. I speak from extensive experience of making exactly these sorts of mistakes all the time with my roads in SimCity 2000.

Any clues in the System event log on affected clients?

This is how we've generally got them laid out. Generally easier to install/maintain and gives flexibility to use the room without computers being too much in the way if they're not being used. Also helpful for teachers' supervision of computer use. We expect to retain computer suites only for subject areas where certain Windows desktop software is required. Mainly that would be Technology subjects and Music. Everything else will end up being Chromebooks in vanilla classrooms.

One thing that springs to mind is DNS. Check that affected clients are able to resolve DC hostnames okay.

Wow. I'm not surprised you have an Eldar-shaped itch after seeing that. My friend's is also Biel-Tan, but he tells me that he regrets that choice, as the large, white curved surfaces are a pig to do nicely.

I like it. I've a friend who collects Eldar and his hobby skills are much better than mine. I too have a bit of an Eldar-shaped itch, I must confess. It's been nice to see them add some new models to the range recently.

Tax wheels. Increase with radius, width and quantity. Motorised vehicles only. The important bit is to actually allocate taxes raised by motor vehicles to road maintenance, which I suspect is definitely not what actually happens.

IE really doesn't want to die, does it. "I've cut yer legs off!!" "'tis but a scratch"

IIRC pyw files will rely on pythonw.exe being able to run. I suppose you could block python.exe but allow pythonw.exe. Can't speak to how open to abuse that would leave things, though.

Another option is to use Wisesoft NTFSFix - https://wisedataman.com/ntfsfix It's pretty old but will let you do what you want. Note that .NET 2.0 is required to run NTFSFix (enable .NET 3.5 in Windows to get support for 2.0). To get a working utility from the download, you'll need to do the following: Use a zip utility to extract an MSI file from the download. Don't run that MSI. It requires .NET 1.1 so won't now work. Instead, extract the program's executable from the MSI using... msiexec /a c:\setup.msi /qb TARGETDIR=c:\ntfsfix NTFSFix.exe is then essentially a portable app. Run it as admin on the server hosting your users' home folders. Assuming the folders are named to match their respective users, you can use a wildcard of DOMAIN\%foldername% in the utility when setting up the required new security entries.

We're on 'Moderate restricted' and the video shows as being watchable in our domain. I don't know if that approval was automatic or actioned by one of our staff members. What do you have your staff OU set at in "Admin > Account > Account settings > Age-based access settings"? That will be a factor in the availability of YouTube content for them. Also, review your settings at "Apps > Additional Google services > Settings for YouTube > Content settings" to make sure that your staff are able to approve videos if needed.

Maybe something in their Chrome settings that is following them around via Chrome sync? Perhaps the Sites URL is prohibited from using cookies or something? Have a hunt through chrome://settings/content for anything relating to the affected apps that might be able to be cleared or reset.

Google Maps. Right-click on the map and select Measure distance to get a handy measuring tool.

Hey, that pun was originally one of... mine! EDIT: adding emphasis because it would seam... to be more subtle than it ought to have been for this thread.

We're using Google Slides. Displays driven by Raspberry Pi's running Raspbian. In Slides, "File > Publish to the Web" gives you a URL that you can point your signage device at. EDIT: the display endpoints aren't cloud-managed in this example. Not sure if the OP is needing that.

But would the stats take into account people like me who've been removing these antennae from hundreds other people's cars for them without them knowing?

Well said!

I made the 'mistake' of reloading my browser tab for it yesterday, following weirdness about the solution being different for different players. The solution for me was 'agora' (wth?) whereas those with a freshly loaded copy of the site got the NYT flavour of the game, where the solution was actually 'aroma'. The page now has trackers and cross-site cruftiness which means the game is DEAD TO ME NOW!

We've used those older type quite successfully, although we generally opt for USB-C to VGA adapters now, since all our non-VGA laptops have USB-C. We bought a bunch of the StarTech USB-C to VGA adapters, but they're not proving to be as robust as the HDMI ones. Quite a few have failed despite not looking particulary badly treated.

After upgrading to 4.7.14 today, this post has just saved me, thanks. I must have forgotten to document those two line additions when I last installed an update.