Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Help,

Currently all my users data sits on a single PDC, I just purchased a new server which I will use purely as a fileserver. I can't make my mind up whether to use Windows Server 2003 R2 that can do quotas on shares or have an open source NAS using either freenas or openfiler. Can anyone tell me what the benefit would be in using the NAS solution?

 

thanks

Posted
samba is faster. VFS allows you to do things like recycle (undelete for students), file auditswithout paying for addons. you can also 'veto' certain filetypes such as .exe very easily. samba VFS also does quotas.
Posted
Well with openfiler it'll work just like a member server. It'll pick up all your domain users and groups fine. Also, assuming you use a file system that supports extended ACLs, you can assign permissions just like you can on NTFS file systems. You get shadow copies and quotas too.
  • 9 months later...
Posted
If your server has wss on which I have it works really well because it works with backup exec 11d remote agent and dont have to backup cifs shares this would be quite hard to setup. Windows storage server does not have all the services etc that server 2003 r2 has.
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I Know you can quota on openfiler even if you cant intergrate 2003 r2. and it is free.

 

R2 cannot be installed on any RM CC3 servers, according to RM its not an upgrade :rolleyes:.

 

However R2 is as standard on new CC4 servers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...