Popular Post Pyroman Posted July 21, 2011 Popular Post Posted July 21, 2011 A Very interesting article if you get a spare 20 minutes How Digital Detectives Deciphered Stuxnet, the Most Menacing Malware in History | Threat Level*| Wired.com 12
X-13 Posted July 21, 2011 Posted July 21, 2011 That was a gripping read, well worth the time I second this. Good find.
synaesthesia Posted July 21, 2011 Posted July 21, 2011 Very interesting indeed - it amazes me how much we think we know about something from the news and our own delvings into the security world is belittled by the wealth of information from that article alone. It also highlights/reminds us that behind the moronic facades of most "security" companies like McAfee and Symantec, there are indeed some damned genius people.
Achandler Posted July 22, 2011 Posted July 22, 2011 Blocked for Malware here hahaha. I'll unblock it and read it this afternoon once school has ended here.
Pyroman Posted July 22, 2011 Author Posted July 22, 2011 The thing it only sort of touches on is who actually made this malware, I would suggest that it probably was a government. What does everyone else think?
jinnantonnixx Posted July 22, 2011 Posted July 22, 2011 The thing it only sort of touches on is who actually made this malware, I would suggest that it probably was a government. What does everyone else think? Probably a government agency, like Association of National Park Authorities or the Pensions Ombudsman. Seriously, wouldn't this make a great film?
Trapper Posted July 23, 2011 Posted July 23, 2011 The thing it only sort of touches on is who actually made this malware, I would suggest that it probably was a government. What does everyone else think? More than likely the US and Israel maybe a CIA/Mossad project.
RabbieBurns Posted August 1, 2011 Posted August 1, 2011 Researchers Say Vulnerabilities Could Let Hackers Spring Prisoners From Cells | Threat Level | Wired.com http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2011/07/PLC-White-Paper_Newman_Rad_Strauchs_July22_2011.pdf
arwen Posted August 1, 2011 Posted August 1, 2011 Thanks for the great read. Hopefully this has opened companies eye that they should not assume hackers cant do something. To me, its best if you assume anything you can do, a hacker can do too, and possibly more! It does sound politically motivated though...
Arthur Posted August 2, 2011 Posted August 2, 2011 For anyone who thought Wired's article wasn't technical enough, Microsoft's Mark Russinovich has an excellent series of articles on Stuxnet... Analyzing a Stuxnet Infection with the Sysinternals Tools, Part 1 Analyzing a Stuxnet Infection with the Sysinternals Tools, Part 2 Analyzing a Stuxnet Infection with the Sysinternals Tools, Part 3 See also... Symantec's W32.Stuxnet Dossier (PDF) Stuxnet's Footprint in Memory with Volatility 2.0
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now