Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi there,

 

I look after a small primary school network. We have no dedicated ICT suite - instead we have a number of computer bay areas around the school and some laptops in a mobile trolley unit.

 

We are looking for a piece of software that would allow us to block inappropriate internet searches - before they are sent to the internet! We do have filtering in place through our broadband supplier, but this doesn't always help when one or two children decide to look for certain things in particular! Therefore we would like to have some kind of monitoring software that would intercept any inappropriate search strings before it gets sent to the search engine. Does such a thing exist? We would like to be able to monitor and log the "search" activity.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks

Posted
Why not limit their searches to using something like 'Ask Jeeves' or similar rather than internet explorer - that way it will be a safe search and not allow anything unsuitable
Posted
Why not limit their searches to using something like 'Ask Jeeves' or similar rather than internet explorer - that way it will be a safe search and not allow anything unsuitable

 

Safesearch will still allow stuff through.

 

I think the best way to do this would be to get some filtering software that has key word blocking. For example you could block someone seaching 'cars' if you wanted.

The software isnt cheap though.

Posted
We are looking for a piece of software that would allow us to block inappropriate internet searches - before they are sent to the internet!

 

Client-side software is probably the wrong place to be doing that, you're better off sticking with a gateway filtering solution. If your current filtering service doesn't offer keyword filtering then, as pointed out above, you can put your own extra filter in place, i.e. a server that sits between your network and your Internet connection and filters out inappropriate searches. You could set up your own (free) Squid filter, or as pointed out above, Smoothwall Express might fit your needs.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
You do need some content filtering - I'd never seen duckduckgo before so I tried it. "sex" gave no results but "making babies" gave some decidely dodgy results (and, yes, I was being "naughty" but that doesn't seem like an unreasonable phrase for young children to use)
Posted
Safesearch will still allow stuff through.

 

I think the best way to do this would be to get some filtering software that has key word blocking. For example you could block someone seaching 'cars' if you wanted.

The software isnt cheap though.

 

Dansgardian and Squid can do keyword filtering

 

for example if a website contains to many rude/unsuitable words it will block the site. Doesn't work 100% of the time but it works 9/10.

Posted

@rednight:

I would point you in the direction of IPCop which is free software which will install on a modest computer with 2 network cards installed and fulfil all you requirements.

 

We used it here for 8 years very good:IPCop - Home

 

good luck :D

Posted
@rednight:

I would point you in the direction of IPCop which is free software which will install on a modest computer with 2 network cards installed and fulfil all you requirements.

 

We used it here for 8 years very good:IPCop - Home

 

good luck :D

 

 

Didnt think IPcop could do filtering. Thanks :)

Posted

Thanks for all your replies and suggestions.

 

Just to clarify things a little ... (and probably should have mentioned in my original posting - sorry!!!)

 

We are running ISA 2006 as a proxy/firewall - but afaik there is no way to filter search strings on their way out .... if anyone knows if this is possible, I would be really interested!

 

We do have content filtering in place via the LA - but as always, it is never going to be 100% and there is always a chance of something slipping through ... that's really why I asked about a bit of software that can filter the search string itself before it gets to the internet rather than relying on the filtering of the results!!

 

It is mainly images that need filtering - with everyone so reliant on Google these days, it is really difficult to find a suitable alternative (we did use askkids for a while, but something seems to have happened to their image search .. it has disappeared!!).

 

I really appreciate all your replies - what a great forum - thank you!

Posted
It is mainly images that need filtering

 

Does your LA-provided Internet connection force Google (and Bing, etc) SafeSearch for image searches, or are unwanted results still coming through on SafeSearch? You might want to ask your LA if they can simply turn on forced SafeSearch for your school - it should be a feature of any decent filtering solution. They probably leave it off by default as other schools will have their own filtering in place.

Posted
Smoothwall express does not have the search term filtering on it - or AFAIK in any of the add-ons? We certainly do it in the full version of our filter though.
Guest Guest
Posted (edited)
Smoothwall express does not have the search term filtering on it - or AFAIK in any of the add-ons? We certainly do it in the full version of our filter though.

 

Not in the true sense afaik no, but with the DG add-on if you type in something naughty the search results will trigger the weighted words filter and not allow you on the page.

Edited by Guest
Posted

If you use mandatory profiles, you can at least make sure Google Safe Search is always switched on every time the little darlings go into internet explorer the first time.

 

There is no substitute for a high quality filter such as Smoothwall. At my independent primary our ISP is RM and we have RM SafetyNet Plus (not my choice). That, combined with the mandatory profile approach, means that I get very few incicents (one in the last twelve months)

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Thanks for all your comments and advice again. I do use mandatory profiles - but have found that sometimes when I have configured Google safe search and then re-exported the profile, the next time I login using the new profile Google search is still set to moderate. The Google description of "moderate" is that it will apply a strict filter to images anyway, and from what I have seen when testing with certain search strings - that appears to hold true.
Posted
Thanks for all your comments and advice again. I do use mandatory profiles - but have found that sometimes when I have configured Google safe search and then re-exported the profile, the next time I login using the new profile Google search is still set to moderate. The Google description of "moderate" is that it will apply a strict filter to images anyway, and from what I have seen when testing with certain search strings - that appears to hold true.

 

When you set up your Google Safe Search to strict... make it the last thing you do before you save the profile as mandatory. It is saved in a cookie, so deleting that cookie will put it back to moderate!

Posted
Yeah squid sounds like best option, you just need to know a bit of linux, which is not always easy - both smoothwall and RM SmartCache (Part of safetyNet plus) use it. There are lots of other pieces of software, but the price usually is quite high - Bloxx come to mind and Securas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...