Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
i got 10.5 running natively on my laptop (external sb hdd) but only to see if i could as soon as you try and update it breaks and it diddnt like my wifi card
Posted (edited)

Well, just wrote a big post that vanished *peice of junk...grr*

 

Summery;

 

Aim for intel over AMD.

Graphics card over onboard

Decent motherboard with good quality standard chips. None of this VIA rubbish.

Try to get it as vanilla as possible, that way minor updates shouldnt brick it.

Sata DVD drive over IDE.

 

Go on here and check the HCL, and any instructions, kexts, etc on your hardware OSx86

You'll want this http://code.google.com/p/osx86tools/ - allows you to easily add EFI strings (to get your gfx card working) and kexts (drivers).

 

 

I've had 10.5 on the Gigabyte P35-DS3R with a Geforce 8400 running perfectly. No problems whatsoever, and benchmarked at the same performance as an equivilent Powermac.

Edited by Guest
Posted

 

I use a Mac so i dont really have a use for this. I am just curious.

 

Do you have to run Multibeast again if you upgrade to say 10.6.6

Posted
I think it's more a question of why you would want to really. Reminds me of a friend of mine who in his twenties used to delight in seeing what ridiculously overpowered engine he could cram into an unsuspecting second hand car. He went through loads of these designs, each one more challenging than the last, really just to see if it could be done. Of course, what he ended up with is a back yard full of lethal, temperamental, illegal and frankly unsellable monsters. I met him again recently. He drives a Volvo now. :)
Posted
Not legally, no.

 

Ahh, but the disc came with a logo to stick on.... ;) also I'm not sure that it is against the law. Just that Apple don't like it.

 

Reason is - we want to have a look without incurring Apples extortionate hardware costs! Just experimenting.

Posted
Ahh, but the disc came with a logo to stick on.... ;) also I'm not sure that it is against the law. Just that Apple don't like it.

 

Reason is - we want to have a look without incurring Apples extortionate hardware costs! Just experimenting.

 

The problem is, its not been tested in UK courts. It has been tested in US courts, and was found to be illegal there (ie. copyright infringement due to breaching the terms of the license granting use of the software). The terms of the license are available off disc (on their website, or by asking for them, for example) and on the external of the box is a thing saying 'Use of this product is subject to acceptance of the license agreement(s) included in this package.' and their website address. So in the end, as an end-user you're being granted a license to use it, and if you don't follow the terms of that license then you don't have copyright permission and therefore are breaking copyright law.

 

That's my understanding of it anyway!

Posted
i wouldnt mind getting it running on a vm.. I support a number of mac users as well and it would save me heaps of time if i had it running locally on my desktop rather than hunting for a spare macbook every time.
Posted

If I remember correctly, Apple reworded their EULA slightly to only allow Mac OS X to be used on Apple branded computers, rather than anything with an Apple logo on it which I think it said previously. This most likely did this to stop people using the stickers and claiming they now had a computer which had an Apple logo on it. :)

 

2. Permitted License Uses and Restrictions.

A. Single Use License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, unless you have purchased a Family Pack or Upgrade license for the Apple Software, you are granted a limited non-exclusive license to install, use and run one (1) copy of the Apple Software on a single Apple-branded computer at a time. You agree not to install, use or run the Apple Software on any non-Apple-branded computer, or to enable others to do so. This License does not allow the Apple Software to exist on more than one computer at a time, and you may not make the Apple Software available over a network where it could be used by multiple computers at the same time. (Source)

Posted
If I remember correctly, Apple reworded their EULA slightly to only allow Mac OS X to be used on Apple branded computers, rather than anything with an Apple logo on it which I think it said previously. This most likely did this to stop people using the stickers and claiming they now had a computer which had an Apple logo on it. :)

 

but how enforcable is it?

 

ive seen things in software licence agreements like must not be stored in a data retrieval system. Does that include a software shelf/cd wallet/cupboard etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...