Simcfc73 Posted November 17, 2010 Posted November 17, 2010 I am purchasing another T710 to go with the one I got last year for my school which will run as a file server and a failover HYPER-V server in case one fails. The one I got last year has 6 SAS disks and a couple of CPUS and 16Gb ram... this one will be lower spec as I am looking at buying a QNAP NAS drive to go with it. We have 2 sites linked by fibre... pretty much all the school is in 2 halves.. would you purchase 2 smaller NAS drives and put one at each end of the fibre or is that stupid? I was thinking of getting the TS-439 Pro II Turbo NAS. I have a small budget so SANs are out BTW Thanks the help
nicholab Posted November 17, 2010 Posted November 17, 2010 You could have a virtual openfiler HA cluster of storage that you reprovision back to the VM's.
RobFuller Posted November 17, 2010 Posted November 17, 2010 The TS-439 wouldn’t be man enough IMO I have a TS-859 Pro+ for my disk based backups and that it can struggle sometimes with only one server attached. I would at a minimum go with the TS-809U-RP if you’re going to use as a main SAN for your network. Putting them at each end of the site isn’t a bad idea, you would need a couple of redundant links and switches. You also want to keep your SAN traffic separate from your main network, vlan will be ok but I would also recommend separate switches for optimum reliability and performance.
Simcfc73 Posted November 17, 2010 Author Posted November 17, 2010 We are a small school (400 users and 70 staff) which is why I went for the smaller model. I have a grand to spend on the NAS/SAN drive. My Server will run Hyper-v which is why I am going for a attached storage option.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now