farquea Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 We have recently installed an app management server where all IT staff can log on and have 1 centralised place where all software and tools are available. However there are 3 members of staff here who will need to be logged on all day. As i understand windows only allows by default 2 simultaneous connections. To have 3 or more does it mean i have to install the Terminal Server role and then purchase a CAL or CALs for these connections, would it be 3 (one for each of us) or just 1 extra?
jamesfed Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 What 'app management' software are you using? If its something like System Centre you may find that you can install the client management software on your technicians PCs that way you wouldnt need to RDP into the server.
Dos_Box Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 Indeed. Is it terminal services you are using or just a client interface such as a webmin?
farquea Posted July 28, 2010 Author Posted July 28, 2010 its nothing specific, but rather than having AD, and exchange tools installed on our desktop PCs we just decided that if we bundled everything onto one server that it would make things a lot easier espeically for the new member of staff who is starting as previously we would jump from server to server to access certain things, now most things, and eveyrthing the new technician will need can all be accessed from this 1 server.
jamesfed Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 its nothing specific, but rather than having AD, and exchange tools installed on our desktop PCs we just decided that if we bundled everything onto one server that it would make things a lot easier espeically for the new member of staff who is starting as previously we would jump from server to server to access certain things, now most things, and eveyrthing the new technician will need can all be accessed from this 1 server. Would something like Remote Server Admin tools work here? You can create custom management consoles which you can use to bring together multiple Windows Server controls like Active Directory, GPOs, DHCP - it can connect to multiple servers at the same time as well if you have things well distributed.
carvjo Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 VNC.. there are various flavours - each with their own merits UltaVNC looked OK last time I used it..
ajbritton Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 VNC.. there are various flavours - each with their own merits UltaVNC looked OK last time I used it.. I suspsect the OP wants 3 independant remote sessions rather than 3 users fighting to remote control a single session. We have this arrangement where I work (all management tools installed on terminal servers) and it works. Having said that, it's far from an optimal experience for the user. I don't know the ins and outs of terminal server licensing, but it may be as simple as installing the terminal server role and buying a handful of licences. How much is a TS CAL (sorry, Remote Desktop CAL) anyway? A couple of £££s?
carvjo Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 I suspsect the OP wants 3 independant remote sessions rather than 3 users fighting to remote control a single session. We have this arrangement where I work (all management tools installed on terminal servers) and it works. Having said that, it's far from an optimal experience for the user. I don't know the ins and outs of terminal server licensing, but it may be as simple as installing the terminal server role and buying a handful of licences. How much is a TS CAL (sorry, Remote Desktop CAL) anyway? A couple of £££s? Yes - that makes sense - silly me! - There is a 120 day trial period after installing TS before the licences must be applied - so it would be possible to test this without spending any money.. If you have a Schools 3 or similar, your licencing agent should be able to get TS CALS for a few pound each on an annual licence, or a few tens of pounds to buy them.
farquea Posted July 28, 2010 Author Posted July 28, 2010 the question is am i buying 1 extra remote desktop cal or 3, 1 for all 3 of us? I HATE MS licensing with a passion, its so unclear most of the time.
ChrisH Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 You should be able to have 2 connections normally eg mstsc -v:server and squeeze in a third using mstsc -console -v:server
farquea Posted July 28, 2010 Author Posted July 28, 2010 You should be able to have 2 connections normally eg mstsc -v:server and squeeze in a third using mstsc -console -v:server I thought about this yesterday but can only get 2 on even using your command and the one i found on google yesterday of mstsc -v:server -console and i think i read somewhere that you could no longer do it but that may of been something else. Can you get 3 logons on a server using the console command out of interest?
ChrisH Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 I thought about this yesterday but can only get 2 on even using your command and the one i found on google yesterday of mstsc -v:server -console and i think i read somewhere that you could no longer do it but that may of been something else. Can you get 3 logons on a server using the console command out of interest? I thought I could. I will check tomorrow. My colleague always seems to have 2 sessions open! So I always use -console. This option is the same as logging on locally.
farquea Posted July 28, 2010 Author Posted July 28, 2010 I thought I could. I will check tomorrow. My colleague always seems to have 2 sessions open! So I always use -console. This option is the same as logging on locally. humm yeah i know cos i can go next door and log on in the server room but just cant get it to work through mstsc. maybe its down to newer versions of mstsc or because im on windows7 maybe? i dunno.
farquea Posted July 28, 2010 Author Posted July 28, 2010 No more MSTSC.exe /CONSOLE | microsoftNOW might explain it. mstsc -v:server /admin works though.
ajbritton Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 Just buy the licences!! Explain to the boss that this will let you do management tasks from anywhere in the building and this will vastly improve efficiency. You are also gaining experience with setting up a TS which might be very useful in the future. It will also save you time when you need to roll out new or updated tools. I also think I'm right in saying that you need to be a server admin. to log on remotely when not in TS mode. That's not ideal. I'm assuming of course that you don't go around logging in with Domain Admin accounts all the time.....
MatthewL Posted July 28, 2010 Posted July 28, 2010 We do very similar have around 10 of us techies working on one box that allows us access to all our different networks.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now