alonebfg Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I dont know what to do. have Just been told that instead on just the one filtered proxy we now have 3 one for staff (unfiltered)i need to set up logins, 2 windows upate will not filter microsoft site. 3 student filter. what a pain i sopose the best thing to do now it to install wsus but i dont know have only got one server and is a primary school i need some idears. did not think i had enough to do it but to log in change proxy update then log out is going to be a pain in the A$$.
Ric_ Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 not sure what you're after here... it sounds like you need an authenticating proxy that reads your user data (solving the login issue) and has an exception so that traffic from your server doesn't get filtered. i'd find an oldish box and install a pre-packaged solution such as IPCop, Smoothwall or Censornet.
steve Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 So....... proxy - a) for staff unfiltered proxy - b) for Windows updates proxy - c) filtered for students If you are running group policies, create a gpo for staff - and set this to use proxy a. Create a gpo for students - and set this to use proxy c. If your pc's are set to run windows updates directly, you may need to reconfig this by setting up a wsus server - as you have suggested, setting this to use proxy b. The other 2 proxies may block updates - why else setup a third just for updates?
CyberNerd Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 proxy - a) for staff unfiltered proxy - b) for Windows updates proxy - c) filtered for students You don't need 3 servers to do this - run the cache on one port 3128 and the filter on another eg 8080 or set wsus to bypass the proxy altogether Dansguardian/Squid does this- probably you could even setup NTLM authentication on another port. Also i find the switchproxy plugin for firefox a great deal of help when I need to switch between proxy servers fast. https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/125/
Geoff Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 I've already solved this with Dansguardian. I'll post my config(s) tomorrow when I'm in school.
k-strider Posted November 15, 2006 Posted November 15, 2006 sounds to me like you're on the south west grid for learning. they have just changed their filters for the staff you need to setup users in the safety net interface you need to tell them the address of your servers so updates continue to work. i don't have web address i'm at home on pda if i remember i'll take a look in the am. i have to do this too
witch Posted November 15, 2006 Posted November 15, 2006 I'm on SWGfL as well, and have heard nothing of this for either school. When did you hear about it?
plexer Posted November 15, 2006 Posted November 15, 2006 I don't think it's a good idea to give staff unfiltered access anyway especially because they might inlclude a site in their lesson planning that they want the students to use and then find its filtered for the students. Ben
Geoff Posted November 15, 2006 Posted November 15, 2006 These are the sections of the Squid.conf that allow windows updates to work without any authentication. #For windows updates acl windowsupdates dstdomain .microsoft.com .windowsupdate.com #Allow windows updates with no authentication (dam M$ buggy junk) http_access allow windowsupdates For differing filter settings for staff/students I just use dansguardians filter groups.
alonebfg Posted November 17, 2006 Author Posted November 17, 2006 sounds to me like you're on the south west grid for learning. they have just changed their filters for the staff you need to setup users in the safety net interface you need to tell them the address of your servers so updates continue to work. this is right thay have just changed there filtering policy sorry i have taken so long to get back had personal problems. i seem to have solved it i have had to install wsus and set that proxy as the update one and everyone else stays on the filtered proxy noone has unfiltered access. the other thing that has changed i have heard is the fact that swgfl now does not inform school of illegal activity it goes straight to the policethe first we know is when the police knock on the school do but what i cant find out is what they class as illegal. Have had a new aup for one of the girlfriend boys and went to a meeting when i asked his school what they beleved to be illegal the said other than the obvious they did not know. here are the updates but there are more which they told me about what arnt listed yet swgfl update
k-strider Posted November 18, 2006 Posted November 18, 2006 I went to a SWGFL internet safety update in gloucs last week where it was referred to... and that is how I found out!!! when they say they let the Police know about illegal activity... they mean illegal... ie child porn... not anything else. (such as inappropriate material.. adult porn)... just attempts to access sites on the IWFs list.. Witch if you’re in Gloucs... I have an email address of the person who sends out updates works for the County Council I can pm you....
CyberNerd Posted November 18, 2006 Posted November 18, 2006 when they say they let the Police know about illegal activity... they mean illegal what about 'new' illegal activity from the 2006 Police and Justice Bill? Aparrently this bill will outlaw commonly used diagnostic tools that 'could' be used for illegal activity such as nmap, ethereal,tcpdump. Law seems such a vague 'chatch all' it could even prohibit scripting languages and entire *nix distributions. http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39284750,00.htm
alonebfg Posted November 18, 2006 Author Posted November 18, 2006 i was also told about racial activity and if they see any that will also be reported to the police unless you tell them that a class is doing a project on it Users shall not: ï§ Visit Internet sites, make, post, download, upload or pass on, material, remarks, proposals or comments that contain or relate to: ï§ pornography (including child pornography) ï§ promoting discrimination of any kind ï§ promoting racial or religious hatred ï§ promoting illegal acts ï§ any other information which may be offensive to colleagues SWGfL acknowledges that in certain planned curricular activities, access to otherwise deemed inappropriate sites may be beneficial for educational use (for example investigating racial issues). Any such access should be preplanned and recorded so that it can be justified if required. sounds good but when will a teacher tell you what they are doing.
john Posted November 18, 2006 Posted November 18, 2006 Sounds like its time to split off from them onto your own system which you deal with.
alonebfg Posted November 19, 2006 Author Posted November 19, 2006 not allowed its a lea thing i beleve all sw schools have got be be on swgfl. Its not that it is a bad thing it is fast very fast and reletive cheap its just getting more confusing.
k-strider Posted November 20, 2006 Posted November 20, 2006 the way it was explained to me is that they only check websites against he IWFs list and flag up any hits. and as far as I can see the IWFs list is just for Illegal child pornography http://www.iwf.org.uk/public/page.148.htm
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now