Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In his speech at the Labour party conference, education secretary Alan Johnson put forward an interesting plan:

 

"As a result of the QCA's report, we will be removing all GCSE coursework from maths and stipulating that in other subjects, coursework must be supervised in classroom style conditions."

 

Now how does this stack up with the DfES policy on e-portfolios and access to work outside of school hours.

 

How the hell can they expect this to be policed?

 

Hello I'm right hand, hello I'm left hand, oo whats that you're doing right hand? 8O

 

Is it just me or does AJ have one of those faces you'd just like to punch?

Posted

no not really big difference between coursework and work coursework is mark for an exam to learn subject still need work.

 

Also look at bigger picture if there is no coursework in gcse maths what subject are they likely to choose to be first ks4 online test :)

 

Russ

Posted

Also look at bigger picture if there is no coursework in gcse maths what subject are they likely to choose to be first ks4 online test :)

 

Russ

 

Did you have to go and ruin my weekend :-)

Posted
no not really big difference between coursework and work coursework is mark for an exam to learn subject still need work.

 

Also look at bigger picture if there is no coursework in gcse maths what subject are they likely to choose to be first ks4 online test :)

 

Russ

 

You almost sound like you are happy about rm developing it. :?

Posted
no not really big difference between coursework and work coursework is mark for an exam to learn subject still need work.

 

Also look at bigger picture if there is no coursework in gcse maths what subject are they likely to choose to be first ks4 online test :)

 

Russ

 

You almost sound like you are happy about rm developing it. :?

 

He is :) Russ is an RM Groupie :lol:

Posted

lol

 

No rm groupie just don't hate them with a passion :) I dislike people getting there views m based on connect 2 as cc3 and connect 2 are two different products and connect 2 was bad cc ant too bad

 

With rm if they do something bad I will say so if they do something good I will say so.

 

What will say is we often forget with rm tests the political nature of the tests if listen to edugeek podcast with ceo of rm tim does speak quite frankly (well as frankly as any ceo can). People wanted a rm to web based test a not going happen as rules from qca state that it couldn't do that not unless it could run if network went down which would have meant a web server service on each pc.

 

There is also a working version of web based test and just dosnt work very well at all?

 

But then you have added thing as Tim said "if you get it wrong questions will asked in parliament" and I wouldn't want tims job for world as fall out if test go tits up would be major.

 

Also the test software is very flexible can be used for any kind of lone test if remember rightly..

 

On serious note if want frank view of rm from man himself do listen to podcast

 

russ

Posted

Actually although I hated parts of 2.4 and CC3 made me angry that I couldn't do everything I wanted I have to say the ICT KS3 test software was very good even when parts crashed it started up in the right place with the clock paused correctly it one of several pieces of software I am happy to use from RM. Also their hardware support is good! (And I have removed CC3 from our network so no I am not an RM groupie either ;) )

 

Wes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...