skawarrior Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 A unit of OCR level 3 ICT requires our students to study computer gaming hardware and software. For this reason I have been tasked with sourcing the hardware, which is an Xbox, a Xbox360, a PSP, a PS3, a Gamecube, a Wii, a DS and a PC capable of playing most modern PC games. The consoles are easy enough but as someone who has always avoided PC gaming in favour of a console I'm not entirely sure what sort of specs I should be looking for. I find that a games official minimum specs have in the past been dubious, so could someone suggest a standard specification bearing in mind that in addition to the consoles 2 HD ready TV's are to purchased so we are on a pretty tight budget. And yes I intend to make use of the new school facilities during half term breaks
silver_hippo Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 The AMD 790X gamer is pretty much it. I reckon good speced gamer computer would be: Dual/ quad core processor at around 2.8GHz. nvidia geforce 9600 gt graphics card or something along those lines. 400w psu. around 160gb 10000rpm hdd (or could go for a larger hdd like 500gb @ 7200rpm) 4gb ram an 64 bit opertating system. Or something like that I hope that helps!
JohnMason Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 The AMD 790X gamer is pretty much it. I reckon good speced gamer computer would be: Dual/ quad core processor at around 2.8GHz. nvidia geforce 9600 gt graphics card or something along those lines. 400w psu. around 160gb 10000rpm hdd (or could go for a larger hdd like 500gb @ 7200rpm) 4gb ram an 64 bit opertating system. Or something like that I hope that helps! If price is a huge factor, 2GB RAM isn't the end of the world. I'm running a comparable system to the one above (but with 2GB ram and an Core 2 Duo E8200 (2.66Ghz dual core) and haven't had any problems with anything yet. So far I haven't found a game that didn't fly by on full settings. Not sure if it's the GT in the 9600 range I have, but really any 9600 should stand up well to any current games?
sidewinder Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 I want your job! I imagine extensive testing of all the consoles will be needed
dhicks Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 I'm not entirely sure what sort of specs I should be looking for. Isn't the latest thing these days to have two (or more?) PCI Express graphics cards installed, configured in "crossfire" mode? And I think you can now get dedicated physics cards... You might want to check the motherboard you get in the machine, make sure it has a bunch of free PCI / Pci Express slots and can support Crossfire. Also, this post might be handy: Coding Horror: Feeding My Graphics Card Addiction -- David Hicks
matt40k Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 Crossfire is AMD\ATI SLI was NVIDIA This is all pretty old hat, Voodoo done this first. Microsoft Windows 7 is rumoured to have support for multiple graphics card. Personally a good DX10 with a fast GPU, GDDR4, about 512mb ram should be fine. Intel new CoreTi or something with support for tri-channel is the best. Personally, a good Core2Duo, 8GB DDR2 800 RAM, WinXP\Vista 64bit, NVIDIA graphics card. Good quality case\psu\etc. Mesh makes some good machines. Alienware being one of the best, no money no object. Maybe RAID-0 SSD for something a bit special.
ahuxham Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 Isn't the latest thing these days to have two (or more?) PCI Express graphics cards installed, configured in "crossfire" mode? And I think you can now get dedicated physics cards... You might want to check the motherboard you get in the machine, make sure it has a bunch of free PCI / Pci Express slots and can support Crossfire. Also, this post might be handy: Coding Horror: Feeding My Graphics Card Addiction -- David Hicks Crossfire for ATI/AMD, SLI for Nvidia. Alot of boards only support either Crossfire or SLI, however new ones support both, PCI-express slots for Crossfire, SLI Ageia do the Physx cards, however Nvidia now own them, so the majority of the technology now sits in there x260 and x280 cards.
somabc Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 It really depends, most modern PC's can play games, just not with a particularly high resolution / frame rate. This might not be that important to you if it is only for educational purposes so you could save some money. If I was going to buy a PC now just to play games and wanted to keep costs down on I would buy something like this. Core 2 - quad core processor 2.4GHZ or higher (not that much more expensive than dual core) ~£100-200 Motherboard (midrange) ~£70-100 4GB RAM ~£50 500GB HD, (SATAII) ~£50 DVD Drive (SATA) ~£20 Graphics Card (mid range) ~£100-200 Case ~£50-100 PSU (around 500W) ~£50 You can plug it into one of the HDTVs via HDMI. If money is no object and you want the newest technology ready made http://www.scan.co.uk/downloads/CPCReview_3XS_X58_Corei7.pdf
DSapseid Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 How about this Alienware machine its quite cheap starting at £2,999!! Oh well best have a whole suite of 30 then.
browolf Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 If you're on some kind of budget generally I've found graphics capability & memory amount is most important.If you skimp on everything else, it might equate to slower throughput generally but it wont stop things working.
pete Posted November 20, 2008 Posted November 20, 2008 Pick the Hot Rod from the Arstechnica System Guide? Ars Technica System Guide: September 2008 Edition: Page 1
skawarrior Posted November 21, 2008 Author Posted November 21, 2008 If we were to go cutting edge would there be a huge difference graphics wise between the same games played on a PS3 or Xbox? The course requires that students can evaluate games on console and on PC. If there is little difference between the consoles and PCs when it comes to playing what is essentialy the same game then I'd rather save cash on the PC system and use it else where i.e better quality TV's.
JohnMason Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 If we were to go cutting edge would there be a huge difference graphics wise between the same games played on a PS3 or Xbox? The course requires that students can evaluate games on console and on PC. If there is little difference between the consoles and PCs when it comes to playing what is essentialy the same game then I'd rather save cash on the PC system and use it else where i.e better quality TV's. A high end gaming machine will be way above a console in terms of graphics.
BatchFile Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 I'm waiting for Grand Theft Auto for the Wii:D:D Punch, kick, shoot then slot on the wheel and drive!!
skawarrior Posted November 21, 2008 Author Posted November 21, 2008 I'm looking at this system it seems reasonable priced for what should provide adequate performance. AMD Nvidia Ultra 400 Gaming PC - Cheap Computers & PC Repairs Wolverhampton Anyone see any flaws in this system bearing in mind I'd like to run the games with most graphical settings on full. Now there is no operating system so I plan on installing XP, a 64bit system would allow full use of the 4GB of RAM. But as JohnMason said 2GB isn't the end of the world, besides which if its a pair of 2GB modules I can reallocate a module to somewhere it would be quite useful.
silver_hippo Posted November 21, 2008 Posted November 21, 2008 Seems pretty good to me! Should run most games on full
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now