MkII Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 Fun and games over on RichardDawkins.net forums this past few days with some insensitive implementation of censorship to enable Richard to comply with Charity Commission requirements. This thread on the new forum guidelines attracted over 1000 posts in approx 2 hours. Several senior members, including former mods and admins, have taken their hats and joined the rebel forum here. In response to this obviously sarcastic jibe by a forum member there: *gasp* You said "sex!" Shame, shame! Hurry, call the Dawkins Thought Police quick!! He said "sex!" Sex is evil and should never, ever be discussed! Richard Dawkins himself had this to say: Oh my, what sparkling wit. There's a spanking new breakaway site for juveniles like you. Please go and suck your thumb there. Oh dear! He's since tried to justify that, if not apologise for it. I suppose I could forgive him for his ignorance of forum etiquette as well as his ignorance of religion Just goes to show how sensitively fora need managing. People get very upset at insensitive handling. RDF is huge and must be quite a monster to manage.
wizzard Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 Hmm really lives up to the tag line "A CLEAR THINKING OASIS".
CyberNerd Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 There's a spanking new breakaway site for juveniles like you. Please go and suck your thumb there. So this is the breakaway site. Go whine somewhere else.
localzuk Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 Lol. I have one comment on this - it is a non-issue. It matters in no way what-so-ever. If you don't like the rules, go somewhere else. Atheists aren't a grouping, so the title of this thread is a bit odd too.
wizzard Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 I think you are over analysing the thread title. Remember many thread titles are created to lure you in to read the thread, sometimes the content of the thread maybe completely different, if it was titled as anything else, I probably wouldn't have given this thread a second glance
somabc Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 Lol. I have one comment on this - it is a non-issue. It matters in no way what-so-ever. If you don't like the rules, go somewhere else. Atheists aren't a grouping, so the title of this thread is a bit odd too. Yes people on a forum have a disagreement and some decide to leave and use a different forum, happens all the time. Its not a reflection on Atheism. Richard Dawkins's post is certainly not one of his best moments but it does go to show if you push someone hard enough they will not always respond in a polite reasoned manner no matter who they are. I think the mistake that some opponents of Atheism make is that they take Richard Dawkins to be some sort of leader of Atheism (like the Pope or Archbishop) and then seize on any mistakes he makes as proof of flaws in Atheism.
Andrew_C Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 I think the mistake that some opponents of Atheism make is that they take Richard Dawkins to be some sort of leader of Atheism (like the Pope or Archbishop) and then seize on any mistakes he makes as proof of flaws in Atheism.Amen to that! Some people believe in faeries and UFOs too...
MkII Posted October 12, 2008 Author Posted October 12, 2008 Yes people on a forum have a disagreement and some decide to leave and use a different forum, happens all the time. Its not a reflection on Atheism. Richard Dawkins's post is certainly not one of his best moments but it does go to show if you push someone hard enough they will not always respond in a polite reasoned manner no matter who they are. I think the mistake that some opponents of Atheism make is that they take Richard Dawkins to be some sort of leader of Atheism (like the Pope or Archbishop) and then seize on any mistakes he makes as proof of flaws in Atheism. Hey Mr serious face! The point of my posting was the magnitude of the ruptions and the insensitivity that caused it, being the interest. Now that you mention it though... I'm finding it interesting to see the debate there between restrictions on free speech versus a moral standing.
joe90bass Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 Even more interesting is that the google ad for this topic is 'Muslim Singles a - Muslim marriage Service'. That could start a whole new debate! I haven't seen any mention of Muslims for it to pick up on.....................
somabc Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 (edited) Even more interesting is that the google ad for this topic is 'Muslim Singles a - Muslim marriage Service'. That could start a whole new debate! I haven't seen any mention of Muslims for it to pick up on..................... Did you see when a woman asked John McCain if Barack Obama was an Arab and he said "No he is a decent hard-working family man" Does that mean Arabs are not decent hard-working family men? Edited October 12, 2008 by somabc
wizzard Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 I'm not that serious I know a song about llamas YouTube - the lama song!!!
MkII Posted October 12, 2008 Author Posted October 12, 2008 Even more interesting is that the google ad for this topic is 'Muslim Singles a - Muslim marriage Service'. That could start a whole new debate! I haven't seen any mention of Muslims for it to pick up on..................... LOL - I didn't notice that!
joe90bass Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 Did you see when a woman asked John McCain if Barack Obama was an Arab and he said "No he is a decent hard-working family man" Does that mean Arabs are not decent hard-working family men? I missed that, so it's not just Bush who makes the odd gaff or two then?!?!
somabc Posted October 12, 2008 Posted October 12, 2008 (edited) I missed that, so it's not just Bush who makes the odd gaff or two then?!?! I think Palin has taken up the challenge! YouTube - Sarah Palin Can't Name a Newspaper She Reads What Newspapers do you read? ALL of them. YouTube - SNL Sarah Palin Interview vs Real Sarah Palin Edited October 12, 2008 by somabc
SpuffMonkey Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Yes people on a forum have a disagreement and some decide to leave and use a different forum, happens all the time. Its not a reflection on Atheism. . Excellent - a schism! Usually this is only done by religions - nice to see atheism flying the flag
Andrew_C Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Atheism will eat itself? If it does, at least it will do it logically without resorting to belief in faeries and re-writing the rules.
MkII Posted January 7, 2009 Author Posted January 7, 2009 Atheism will eat itself? Really mark? Really? ..and I was wondering who'd revived this thread! A. Of course not but we can always dream LOL (Athism will eat itself) If it does, at least it will do it logically without resorting to belief in faeries and re-writing the rules. Hahahahahhaa... (he says non detrimentally ) That's the best definition of atheism I've heard!... re-write the rules and base it on a fantastic belief. Perfect!
beeswax Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 (edited) Ariane Sherine: We did it! The atheist bus campaign is bigger and better then ever | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk Edited January 7, 2009 by beeswax
Andrew_C Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 (edited) That's the best definition of atheism I've heard!... re-write the rules and base it on a fantastic belief. Perfect! I really didn't expect the logic of the junior school playground here... That really beggars belief. Nah nah, I can't hear you! Re-write who's rules? Jehovah, Buddha, Jupiter, or some other deity? Edited January 7, 2009 by Andrew_C
MkII Posted January 7, 2009 Author Posted January 7, 2009 *reels him in* Atheism is a modern day faith supposedly freeing you from preceding belief systems (where have we heard that before I wonder..), itself a step into the un-knowable. Is this not so? (you don't have to answer that! There be Dragons (no really!!!) :D:D I actually agree with the reasoning behind the bus campaign, it being to counteract the awful message "the Jesus Said ads running on London buses in June 2008. These ads displayed the URL of a website which stated that non-Christians "will be condemned to everlasting separation from God and then you spend all eternity in torment in hell". Very wrong. 1
SYNACK Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Since this thread has started up again here are some ammusing and topical cartoons that I found. http://www.theatheistmama.com/images/posts/atheistreligion.gif http://cectic.com/comics/159.png Cectic - Offensive Invasion http://a829.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/6/l_8bb5ed6f37b97585ef61a3e0a51c0ab4.jpg
Andrew_C Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Atheism IS NOT a faith. Faiths are for the delusional.
torledo Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Atheism IS NOT a faith. Faiths are for the delusional. Feeling a little grumpy are we ?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now