Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi Everyone,

 

We currently have PS Financials installed locally onsite with 5 licenses for the two parts of the software that we use. I have requested a quote for two extra licenses to use the software but the price that has been quoted seems ludicrous.

 

1) Annual maintenance will increase by £420 per license.

2) One off cost of £2,000 per license

 

This means that for two licences the year 1 cost will be £4840 if the Annual maintenance is added in year one, I have not checked this. Either way £2000 as a one off costs seems completely over the top to me.

 

Am I being unreasonable in thinking that this is far far too expensive ?!

Edited by soapyfish
Posted

Welcome to the world of PS Financials - unreasonable, expensive and loads more negative words!

 

Hoping that SIMS Finance (as opposed to FMS) proves to be a viable alternative!

  • Thanks 2
Posted

Be glad your not using Symmetry Financials..........

 

It’s supposed cloud based finance system that relies so heavily on the end point and out of date Java.....

Posted
Be glad your not using Symmetry Financials..........

 

It’s supposed cloud based finance system that relies so heavily on the end point and out of date Java.....

And very expensive.
Posted (edited)
And very expensive.

Whilst the cost is probably commercially sensitive.... I can think of over 26,000 reasons why it’s expensive [emoji30][emoji30][emoji30][emoji30]

Edited by Asgard
Posted
Take a look at HCSS, they have a new finance/accounting module that is way better than FMS and seems like it might well be good enough for an academy. (We are not an academy so I can’t vouch for it in that capacity, but o have worked at one)
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Whilst the cost is probably commercially sensitive....

Why? It's public money, you can look up how much a school spends and on what (admittedly at a high level - but you could FOI for detail). The whole idea of the G-Cloud \ Digital Marketplace was clear pricing\terms. How do you know you've got a good deal if it wasn't transparent? The school down the road might have got it for half the price!!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Why? It's public money, you can look up how much a school spends and on what (admittedly at a high level - but you could FOI for detail). The whole idea of the G-Cloud \ Digital Marketplace was clear pricing\terms. How do you know you've got a good deal if it wasn't transparent? The school down the road might have got it for half the price!!

 

I was trying to be a bit diplomatic as they pretty much lurk on here.

 

I know we didn’t get a good deal and a big FE near us pays less than us.

 

In my opinion symmetry is shocking our finance staff hate it.

Posted
Has anyone had experience of the PSF cloud solution ?

 

Not direct experience, but a few schools within original group who ended up making their own MAT migrated from our centrally hosted / externally shared version to their own PS Cloud version.

The last I heard, it improved some bits of functionality (which may be more a case of the fact our PS installation was never properly configured / project managed / checked by PS!), but that some of the processes seem just as slow (e.g. portal etc)

 

We're seriously investigating non-PSF options and hoping that one ticks the box, but if it doesn't we may well end up going the cloud way as the cost difference isn't drastic and makes a whole less lot of hassle when we begin thinking about GDPR implications of being the data host / processor!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
I have to say that I am thinking about so that the hassle is reduced dealing with almost every aspect of them is a diaster, our migrating from 2/4/6 was botched too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...