Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just seen this Airhead 360 which allows you to run full Windows applications within a web browser with accounts provisioned from MIS. They have some schools (I think primaries at the minute) which have eliminated on site servers. I presume the applications are still running in Windows (Azure) servers, but not managed or hosted by the schools, so maybe the best of both worlds...

 

Will we even have a job in a few years?????

Posted
Yes, because users will still know nothing.

∆ This

Will we even have a job in a few years?????

The thing will be to do more with the same amount of resource. If you look at how much kit you have on school and how many hours it's used for compared to 15 or 20 years ago, the job of onsite IT support has changed, but not disappeared.

  • Thanks 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

We are about 50% there, moving more stuff all the time and I couldn't be happier.

 

I'd love to move more of my job towards helping teachers do exciting things with IT rather than fixing desktop clients!

  • 1 year later...
Posted
We are about 50% there, moving more stuff all the time and I couldn't be happier.

 

I'd love to move more of my job towards helping teachers do exciting things with IT rather than fixing desktop clients!

 

It’s the forward thinking way! Brilliant

  • 3 years later...
Posted

Bumping this...

 

Anyone got anything to add to this?

 

We're down to a single Windows server but it's due for replacement and I'm trying to think if I should replace it or if there is an alternative.

Posted
What's it used for?

 

DC (handful of users who have windows)

Print server - PaperCut

 

Errr, that's about it now.

Posted
Could get azure ad for those users

 

Could, but I'm not sure if it's worth it when we are 95% Google. Thinking about it, I only have 5 Windows machines

Posted
Could, but I'm not sure if it's worth it when we are 95% Google. Thinking about it, I only have 5 Windows machines

 

samba server would cost next to nothing resource wise for that.

Posted

Only reason to buy an expensive server to run Windows Server is because you have 1000s of users and it's critical, otherwise just keep the old one/install it on a random PC.

 

The cost is human time for 5 machines, do you even need a server for those? Local logins and save to google drive.

Posted
DC (handful of users who have windows)

Print server - PaperCut

 

Errr, that's about it now.

 

e2-standard-2 (2core 8GB) with an SSD on GCP would cost £31 per month to run that if you could move it to linux.

(with committed use discounts).

 

The azure calculator put it at £122 so not sure if their calculator is busted?

 

Posted
Only reason to buy an expensive server to run Windows Server is because you have 1000s of users and it's critical, otherwise just keep the old one/install it on a random PC.

What nonsence.

I work with 10's of thousands of users on Linux. The only reason to run an expensive windows server is if you have Windows only apps and don't know how to manage linux servers.

Posted
What nonsence.

I work with 10's of thousands of users on Linux. The only reason to run an expensive windows server is if you have Windows only apps and don't know how to manage linux servers.

 

If he didn't have Windows only apps why would he still have Windows clients?

 

Don't you mean OR, not AND?

Posted
If he didn't have Windows only apps why would he still have Windows clients?

 

Don't you mean OR, not AND?

 

You don't need a windows server to run papercut, or to serve windows clients.

Posted

I think the point is to have 0 physical servers, rather than just 0 Windows server VMs.

 

Of course then you need to define what a server is. Your router is now serving dhcp and dns queries perhaps. Your photocopier is now a printer server.

 

A cloud only school still has many servers on prem.

Posted

Thanks for the info and thoughts. The reason we still have a few Windows devices is because of specific software.

 

Next step for me is to move the current machines to non-domain. Given who is using them I'm happy to manually set them up and give the user limited rights.

 

I'll get the router or sophos firewall to handle dns and dhcp.

 

PaperCut won't run on our copiers (only have 2) and 4 other small printers. Might look at giving @ICTDirect_Dave a shout and get a small machine with raid just to run that. Running a smaller, less powerful device would be much more eco friendly plus I could prob sell the current server and rack too.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
PaperCut would probably run a on raspberry pi.

 

True, will look at that, although getting 4s at the moment is tricky, I have some on back order.

 

How do the Chromebooks print?

 

PaperCut

Posted

Seems like it would be simpler just to get some printers that support direct printing by all your OSes.

 

RPi, or any random laptop, anything with an ethernet port and a couple of GB ram.

 

Fun side note: I changed the printers here to connect directly, no print server, using dns names. Then someone broke a printer, so I just changed dns to point to a different one, and as they're all type 4, so xps, it just works.

Posted
Seems like it would be simpler just to get some printers that support direct printing by all your OSes.

 

Yes, but we have logging / restrictions in place. Basic PaperCut gives me the controls needed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...