Hogwarts-Techie Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 Not sure this is the best place to put this! Is anyone using VSAN in production yet? found this thread but no replies http://www.edugeek.net/forums/windows/137030-vmware-vsan.html
PotNoodleTech Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 (edited) Hey that was me. It looks a great product. Not surprised both our threads have zero replies, doubt any schools could stomach the per CPU licencing - it was WAAAAAY too expensive for me so have gone with a 12Gig SAS JBOD array & moving to HyperV too. Edited June 23, 2015 by PotNoodleTech
rich_tech Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 seems impressive technology there, if you can cut out the SAN/NAS devices all the better I think in terms of infrastructure costs, though if its expensive like you have said it isn't going to be an attractive option. Hyper-V is a winner to most people on EES because it comes without the additional costs.
Hogwarts-Techie Posted June 23, 2015 Author Posted June 23, 2015 I would have to say that having used both, VMware is a clear winner for me. i am not 100% sure but i think the essentials plus covers the VSAN. going to check. The cost saving of having to buy a SAN is massive. Purchased mine over a year, ago at a cost of £40,000. A VSAN would save me £1000's
Paid_Peanuts Posted June 26, 2015 Posted June 26, 2015 VSAN is not covered under the essentials plus licencing model. Based on our essentials plus setup over 3 hosts the cost for the VSAN licencing was : £7000+ You have to buy a minimum of 6 CPU licence for it and first years support is mandatory. Add onto that the cost of drives for your hosts... Makes a jbod look more attractive!
Arthur Posted June 26, 2015 Posted June 26, 2015 (edited) Hyper-V is a winner to most people on EES because it comes without the additional costs. When Windows Server 2016 is released next year, you will also get Microsoft's VSAN equivalent - Storage Spaces Direct - for "free". Edited June 26, 2015 by Arthur 1
Steve21 Posted June 26, 2015 Posted June 26, 2015 When Windows Server 2016 is released next year, you will also get Microsoft's VSAN equivalent - Storage Spaces Direct - for "free". Looked so good until I read this bit: Hyper-converged: Where there are 4+ nodes with DAS disks, and this is both the compute and storage tier. There is no other tier, no SAS, nothing, just these 4+ servers in one cluster, each sharing the storage and compute functions with data mirrored across each node. 4 HOSTs minimum. Bit disappointed in that, obviously depends on schools situation, but if they're affording 4 HOSTs with decent DAS you think they'll afford a cheaper (Cheaper as in non-flash/10Gb) SAN option too? :s Will be interesting to see how that actually plays out in theory though, as again I'm guessing if things like HOSTs go offline for maintenance that's gonna cause a huge hit on performance etc? Unless they're splitting it on multiple servers so it can deal with that scenario, which would mean huge reductions in storage space Steve
RobFuller Posted June 26, 2015 Posted June 26, 2015 I guess the minimum node count make sense as the workload would be split on the remaining. I've just ordered 2x 12Gig SAS JBOD arrays like @AButters will be using a mixture of SSD and 10K SAS drives with MS storage spaces to make a SoFS cluster for my hyper-v workloads. Looking forward to using storage spaces direct on my older sever with large DAS. Be interesting if I could tier that into my JBOD pools! Will have to investigate.
rich_tech Posted June 26, 2015 Posted June 26, 2015 Looked so good until I read this bit: 4 HOSTs minimum. Bit disappointed in that, obviously depends on schools situation, but if they're affording 4 HOSTs with decent DAS you think they'll afford a cheaper (Cheaper as in non-flash/10Gb) SAN option too? :s Will be interesting to see how that actually plays out in theory though, as again I'm guessing if things like HOSTs go offline for maintenance that's gonna cause a huge hit on performance etc? Unless they're splitting it on multiple servers so it can deal with that scenario, which would mean huge reductions in storage space Steve That was a little bit disappointing for the smaller sites like ours reading that, were a 2host/SAN setup here. I imagine having to shoot for 10gb cards for servers as a minimum then to handle the internetworking to not smash performance, which is again expensive stuff.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now