[bug/error] Gif problems...

[X-13]

TBH, I'm not sure if this is an EduGeek problem or a chrome problem...

 

 

I was thinking of changing my signature to this:

 

 

But, the gif doesn't display properly in Chrome 35.

 

When it's set to the album cover it shows it animated.

When you view it in the folder it's animated.

 

But when you try to view the image directly, or on it's own page, it fails to load or just shows the first frame.

 

 

Works fine in IE10.

 

 

Le EDIT: Copying the original file into Chrome displays it fine.

Edited June 26, 2014 by X-13

[fairm010]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]25277[/ATTACH]

 

Hmmmm

[X-13]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]25277[/ATTACH]

 

Hmmmm

 

...and that loads fine.

 

 

What a mysterious jogo.

 

 

 

Le EDIT: Oh... mine has loaded properly now.

[Domino]

on behalf of everyone...please don't change your sig to that monstrosity...

[fairm010]

Yep yours is working for me in Chrome 35.

[sparkeh]

Please don't use that sig for fear of inducing fits in the rest of the EG population.

[X-13]

on behalf of everyone...please don't change your sig to that monstrosity...

 

"I don't like it therefore it's horrible"

 

Tell me more things I'm not allowed to enjoy because you don't like it.

 

Please don't use that sig for fear of inducing fits in the rest of the EG population.

 

It's not a flashing image.

 

And flashing images only cause seizures at specific frequencies.

[mac_shinobi]

 

Animated like the above ( scene from iRobot ) ??

[sparkeh]

It's not a flashing image.

 

And flashing images only cause seizures at specific frequencies.

Well it was said with tongue in cheek, however its not just flashing images that bring photosensitive epilepsy episodes and whilst its true that most suffers do fit into a range of frequencies (16-25Hz) there are people that can be triggered as low as 3Hz and as high as 60Hz

 

And it gives me a headache

[CAM]

Doesn't work for me in IE10.

[X-13]

Doesn't work for me in IE10.

 

It's been deleted.

 

Can't be bothered anymore.

[synaesthesia]

Animated avatars are overrated.

[Gatt]

Personally, I'd rather we kept our sig's free from any form of graphics - there's nothing worse than when you visit a forum and struggle to differentiate a post from the signatures around it.

 

As for the OP - I cant see the OP's GIF inline, but can when I open it on a new tab in Chrome.

Well sort of - it seems to be corrupted and doing a crasehd loop of the first frame - the lower half of the GIF is also not rendering right?