Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Well well well, an i3 version at long last - maybe Microsoft do listen after all! Is that the end of the line for RT as well?

 

Increasing the screen to 12" does seem a touch on the large size, hard to tell without seeing one but I suspect it might just be a bit too big to be easy to carry around. The original Surface felt not much bigger than a paper notebook which was ideal, this looks more like a laptop than tablet, at first glance anyway.

 

Don't know why but the logo \ Windows button being the portrait position just looks... wrong :p

Edited by gshaw
Posted (edited)
Well well well, an i3 version at long last - maybe Microsoft do listen after all!

It's always worth waiting until v3.0 with Microsoft products. :)

 

Increasing the screen size 12" does seem a bit on the large size, hard to tell without seeing one but I suspect it might just be too big to be easy to carry around.

I don't think the size or weight will be too much of an issue. It's only 195 grams heavier than a Nexus 10 (and 202 grams lighter than a HP Chromebook 11) and the 3:2 aspect ratio probably helps make it feel smaller than it actually is.

 

SuDn3FnRq2C0.jpe

 

mBGIE2zw8GTA.jpg

 

P8jwtm0Wury2.jpg

 

The new pen is impressive.

 

PXIvtphYK1KB.jpg

Edited by Arthur
Posted
The side by side is interesting, now let's hope MS don't rip off the UK with the dollar to pounds price conversion and one may be on my shopping list (up against the Lenovo ThinkPad 10 that's just been announced as well)
Posted (edited)
The screen is a 3:2 ratio 2160x1440 12-inch part, with the highest contrast ratios in the industry.

 

I looked at the previous one but the 10" screen at 1920x1080 put me off as it was too small to run natively with windows and font scaling is pretty ropey in Windows 8 as we all know. I'm slightly wary as it I think might end up being useless at native res when you go back to using a desktop app. I'm glad they've gone for a 3:2 ratio though as my personal feeling is that 16:9 is a hopeless aspect for a small tablet.

 

Apart from my concerns about that it sounds like a fantastic tablet though and if they can bring it out priced at £600-700 I think they might finally have a device to tempt people away from their ipads. Will be heading off to see one of these when my local retailers have it in stock.

 

Having said that I'm starting to feel dejavu as every time MS release a Surface Pro tablet I get hyped and tempted to go out and buy one! So far there' always been something that's put me off though ! The first one was the poor battery life. When they fixed that I was frustrated by how unusable 16:9 was on a small 10" 1080p screen especially on the desktop.

 

This time.....we'll see :p

Edited by flyinghaggis
Posted
I'm slightly wary as it I think might end up being useless at native res when you go back to using a desktop app. I'm glad they've gone for a 3:2 ratio though as my personal feeling is that 16:9 is a hopeless aspect for a small tablet.

What if you set the scaling to 200%? Then it would be equivalent to a 1080x720 display.

 

That said, Windows developers really need to get their act together regarding hi-ppi support in their desktop apps.

 

ZPYo7ns1Nt3F.png

 

^ This sort of thing is unacceptable.

Posted

The i3 model has to be around £400-500 to make any dent in market share imo. Paying £600-700 for the basic spec isn't worth it, for the i5 model maybe but again I guess it comes down to whether MS want market share or just high-end ultrabook customers.

 

Wish the manufacturers would stop ripping us off without keyboards though, they must cost peanuts to make yet being sold as a £100 accessory?!

Posted
I looked at the previous one but the 10" screen at 1920x1080 put me off as it was too small to run natively with windows and font scaling is pretty ropey in Windows 8 as we all know. I'm slightly wary as it I think might end up being useless at native res when you go back to using a desktop app. I'm glad they've gone for a 3:2 ratio though as my personal feeling is that 16:9 is a hopeless aspect for a small tablet.
Yep this is exactly my thoughts too, otherwise it looks great.
Posted
Maybe I'm the odd one out but I like the 16:9 on the RT I use at work. snapping two apps side by side still leaves enough space to do something useful on either but still small enough to be easy to carry around.
Posted (edited)
What if you set the scaling to 200%? Then it would be equivalent to a 1080x720 display.

 

I wondered that aswell since you can literally scale 1 pixel to 4 which could in theory mean that you don't need to worry about scaling issues. In practice however when you actually set font scaling in windows to 200% you often find there are loads of things that don't scale cleanly or don't scale at all which would render them unreadable on high DPI 12" display. Microsoft REALLY need to start addressing this as high DPI 'retina' displays are pretty much the norm on tablets and with 4k displays becoming mainstream they'll soon be the norm on larger monitors as well.

Edited by flyinghaggis
Posted

So, the Surface was supposed to be the "iPad killer" when it came out. Now, the Surface 3 is the "laptop killer"?

 

I'll wait to see how well this goes over with all of the hardware companies out there building Windows laptops. Unless MS intends to become the dominant Windows PC hardware manufacturer, I think they are painting themselves into a corner.

Posted
I'll wait to see how well this goes over with all of the hardware companies out there building Windows laptops. Unless MS intends to become the dominant Windows PC hardware manufacturer, I think they are painting themselves into a corner.

 

Umm, seriously? What's wrong with the software developer building a template device? Are we forgetting about the Google Nexus range? It's no different then a new hardware manufacturer appearing, just means you need to release a better (in some way) device. As for "iPad killer" quotes, what, have you never seen a sales pitch? Apparently if I buy this sports car I'll be beating women off with a stick because it'll turn me into fit underwear super model, got it take it all with a pitch of salt.

Posted
What if you set the scaling to 200%? Then it would be equivalent to a 1080x720 display.

 

That said, Windows developers really need to get their act together regarding hi-ppi support in their desktop apps.

 

I think this comes from the whole "WinForms" based programs - creating Winforms UIs that scale well for high DPI screens is quite a lot of work. As more and more stuff is replaced by WPF based programs it will improve, as DPI resizing is built into it. So long as developers don't cheat and include pre-made windows (such as the Database Connection dialog) in their new programs.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

The MS Surface is a quality device, I had a play with a staff members RT tablet the other day, it feels decent enough and polished using it, though the lack of outlook and domain connectivity is a killer for that particular one, not a fan of the touch cover either.

 

I always thought that a MS Surface pro in work would make for an excellent mobile admin station when we go full wireless, but price is a massive factor its just too high comparative to Apple/Android based stuff, though it definitely is a high end product I think.

Posted

£1,649 for the Core i7/512GB :eek:

 

For me, I can never justify the costs on these types of devices because it's a one time purchase with no chance of upgrade in the future. Just like the MacBook Pro Retina Display, I'd want one with 16GB RAM and 512GB Flash, because neither are upgradable at a later date. You have to spend the big bucks at the time of purchase and when you see the final cost, you can never bear to part with that amount!

Posted
Pre order prices are here Surface Pro 3 - Microsoft Store United Kingdom Online Store

 

Pricing starts at £639 for the 64GB i3 up to £1339 for the 256GB i7

 

No prices for the covers yet though

 

At those prices you might as well pay 100 quid more and get a Macbook air.

 

Surface is OK, but I still don't think Microsoft really knows what market its going for.

 

People want a corporate device that works on windows and is easy to carry around, its nearly there but not quite.

Posted
At those prices you might as well pay 100 quid more and get a Macbook air.

 

Why? The Surface Pro 3 is slimmer, lighter and can switch to a tablet form factor...

 

Surface is OK, but I still don't think Microsoft really knows what market its going for.

 

People want a corporate device that works on windows and is easy to carry around, its nearly there but not quite.

 

I'd've said that they're right there with this device.

Posted

£639 for the i3 with no cover... fail

 

So much for the BBC article suggesting a more reasonable £475. It seems Microsoft don't want any real market share with the Surface line, just an expensive luxury product for specialised users, which is a shame really.

 

Looks like Lenovo ThinkPad 10 for me, unless that comes in at a similarly silly price.

Posted (edited)

 

There's a pretty serious gap in pricing between the 128Gb and 256Gb i5 models. £849 vs £1109. Somewhat annoying as I reckon the Core i5/256Gb is the model most people would want.

 

They seriously want another £260 for another 128GB!!! I wonder if the 128Gb model only has 4Gb of RAM rather than 8gb?

Edited by flyinghaggis

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...