Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The thing is, Defra repeatedly lied to the public too - saying that "every badger was cleanly shot and killed instantly".

 

Not only that, but the whole "incorrect data" thing that came out a few weeks back - which showed that bTB herd infection rates were *far* less than stated as justification for the culls - shows that Patterson and DEFRA can't be trusted.

 

Look at Wales - they backed out of engaging in a cull, and they've seen something like a 24% drop in incidence through purely better animal husbandry and better bio-security. That proves the statement made by Patterson that "no country has successfully tackled bTB without including culling".

 

Hopefully, this report will be the final nail in the coffin of the culls.

  • Thanks 2
Posted

Yup. There's an FOI document with some more info too (I'll add it when I get home).

 

Some of the highlights: the number of kills reported included roadkill animals that were found and added. Also, there were reports of new badger runs where they hadn't existed before the cull interfered with the setts - exactly the thing that was warned about (ie. perturbation), and will cause an increase in bTB spreading.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...