DT2

We had a wee bit Sunday..... Kevin McGrath, Dieppe resident, shows massive snowbanks on YouTube - New Brunswick - CBC News That's not me, but this is where I moved to from sunny Rochdale... @tom_newton DT2

wmic product where "name like ''" call uninstall /nointeractive Might have to issue: taskkill /F /IM iexplore.exe in case any open processes cause issues.... I use this effectively for all kinds of things (utorrent, TOR etc) Just check the running process for the name.....

I'm currently working on a new wireless network at work. I have the WLC and APs setup (2504 WLC and 3x 2602 APs) , they're broadcasting and just about everything that needs to be in place is. Except just one small problem.... RADIUS! I've got the server running, and I can see the requests hitting the server from the Cisco, but I cannot for the life of me get it working and allow me to connect to the SSID. I spent pretty much the whole of yesterday double checking my work and reading up on RADIUS setup to no avail, so I figured I'd ask and see if anyone here had more experience with NPS policies for RADIUS than I. I'd like to use RADIUS to authenticate a user on the corporate WLAN, alongside group membership to ensure that not just anyone can connect. I'd also like to be able to use it to do web auth for the guest SSID. Any help is much appreciated. DT

DOOM! show these kids what today's gaming came from! And it's free!!!!

I built a site for my mom's business, an online store for my dad's business, a site and php forums for the non-profit organization that I chair. And several other little projects along the way. It's a lot of work at first, but just an hour here and there now to update things.

I'll skip the rant.... I'm running a secure ftp server, open ssh version 5. I'm trying to chroot the users belonging to sftpusers group (completed successfully). However, what is of annoyance to me is that any users connecting now cannot write to the directory in which they are jailed!! If i change the permissions on the directory to allow this, the server rejects the connection for security reasons. I need an sftp server that will chroot the users and allow them to write to their respective directories.... In short.. HELP!!! (please ) Anyone have any tips? Thanks in advance. DT EDIT: Scrap that, sussed it. However any files I try to upload seem to fail at exactly 56832000 bytes.... cannot find this set limit anywhere..... any ideas? I've set a 100Mb limit in limits.conf for the concerned usergroup, still nothing...

It would appear we have routing issue.... Anything from this site routing out over the internet and back into our Fredericton site has the issue. Anything connecting in from Fredericton doesn't have the issue..... testing from home tonight, see if the issue persists over a different route. Thanks guys I appreciate the help. DT

Nope, it does not. In fact i can't send/receive anything from a server on the same host......

Not yet (SELinux) working on it this morning. when it comes to ideas... I'm a sponge!! keep sending them

Hi guys, So I recently built an FTP server (public) for our VoIP configs on CentOS using VSFTPD. The problem I have now is that I cannot retrieve anything from the server. Uploading to the server is just fine, 3.6 Mbps. I'm lucky if I get a sustained 3Kbps download. Some background: VMware esx 5.1, using E1000 nic (also tried flexible). CentOS 5.5 and vsftpd. The config is good, we've all but ruled out issues with networking kit/hardware by testing other servers in the same subnet. I'm thinking maybe something in the setup, or a problem with the VM itself. I have some more testing to do, I was just wondering if anyone had experienced something similar/the same? Thanks in advance. DT

Nay, not the unemployed in general. The bone idle, the one's who are "unemployed by choice". Where I used to live there was plenty of them.... That was my aiming point. Politicians are on the same level, bills and expenses paid for by you and me. As for the genuinely unemployed (those that have been made redundant etc, and would ike to work) I really would't gripe at them using the system to their benefit and cover what they need. I do however take issue with those who abuse that system and take away from those who genuinely need it. Hope that's straightened my point out a bit.

It *should* be, yes. But just think of all those folks who keep warm on your tax money having never graced a place of work in their lives. Whilst you sit and freeze, and bust a gut on a daily basis trying to make ends meet.... The first house I bought was gloriously warm, but only because the guy next door never worked a day in his life and always had the heat up full. I didn't need my heating because effectively my taxes were paying his bill anyway... God forbid these people be forced to work and not have enough money to go round, that's some kind of travesty you know

Under the account tab in ADUC

Electricity here is expensive, and the options for house heat are wood/oil burning stoves or furnaces, pellet stoves, and baseboard heaters (hideous, antiquated things that attach to the skirting board and burn leccy for fun). Central heating isn't common, and most insurance companies won't touch your property if you've got it out here (in the sticks). I like snow, and I don't mind winter so much, but I could easily live without -38c again..... Last winter we burnt 6 cord of wood (a stack 24ft long, 4ft high and 16" wide is a cord) and about a tank of oil (200 gallons US) which came to around $2200 or 1600GBP for the winter (Nov-April).More than I would have forked out in gas and leccy back in blighty for the same period. I have friends who run baseboards only, and their monthly hydro bill is $500+ through the winter (hydro is what they call the leccy here, because most of it is from the hydro dams). Electricity companies worldwide are not shy about hiking prices that's for sure, and unfortunately the government hasn't the spine to intervene......

Just you wait, won't be too long before that mutates into "Daddy, I need some money...." I hear that way too much......