I think to say EDIT (we're no longer called that) have given you a bad service is unfair Pottsey. I believe you thought you had a bad service from one person in particular so to label us all under the same umbrella is not really cricket – even then that was to go onto our AD infrastructure at a cost to US!, to which might I add that the school had agreed and only part way through the install did you raise any concerns. We dutifully rolled what we had done back and awaited the outcome. Now I could understand that you had concerns about going on the AD as you wanted to remain as autonomous as possible – fair enough – but even when you were offered alternatives none of them were taken up. As a consequence you now have a decent server box sat switched off doing bugger all!
Your network sucks – mini hubs hanging off everywhere, a hub in the main cab, you’re running 2003 server on an old hp pc connected to one of those hubs. Money and finances are not an excuse, just speak to the head at John Davies. Which brings me to another of your points.
I take exception to you speaking for other schools, and none of the schools I visit feel the same way you do Pottsey. If you want a list of schools I visit I will be more than happy to oblige when I see you in 2 weeks.
You are not forced to use all of our services, yet you still buy back at the second highest level year after year - why is that? Surely if we offered such a poor service you would only opt for the most basic options?
I really feel disappointed you have slagged us off like this, and didn’t even mention it yesterday when I was there.