Jump to content

CraigMcKee

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

6 Neutral

About CraigMcKee

Recent Profile Visitors

134 profile views
  1. Ha - I would hope no one would do that - as always check the output but the article posted did refer to it as a college - I purposefully found an initial article about the actual killing because everything since has been more about legacy and aftermath. You raise a good point about paraphrasing and something I will tighten up in the back end so it doesn't fill in gaps (with incorrect information) or change the meaning of things. The dates you shared, is that page modified? The tools on the pages are embedded so the page updates don't reflect the actual tool updates as the embed code hasn't changed. If I could tell the future, it would be Euromillions all the way
  2. Incidently, I've just tried this as our Assembly Tool has been used a lot of create assemblies about Charlie Kirk - so I added a direct link to a BBC article and this was the response from The Key I've attached the Assembly Script SLT AI wrote... SLT AI - Assembly Writer - 1757840005.docx
  3. Yeah, I mean look at Oak - £2,000,000 from the tax payer. It didn't cost us £2,000,000 to set up and I have no intention of charging ££££’s like other leadership platforms. £95 is fairly I feel so we're happy there and it becomes a no brainer for leaders.
  4. Hi, I'd disagree that we don't have a unique selling point but that's ok. You could absolutely recreate everything we do yourself, it's just a question of how valuable your time is. For example, the new SEF Converter - upload your existing SEF based on the old OFSTED framework and it rewrites based on the new framework. Upload a file, click, done. You can do this yourself but a lot of work getting the new framework in the required format, getting the instructions right so that it does what you actually need it to, then testing different models to see which works the best - etc etc etc. As a HT, my time was way more valuable that the £95 a year this costs but, as I said, you could absolutley do this by yourself - just takes a lot longer - and this is 1 tool out of 160 (and growing).
  5. This is unrelated to education but I asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Co-Pilot what the current stamp duty rates are on a second home in the UK (thinking of the current Angela Rayner media coverage). All four got it wrong and didn't know about the October 2024 change. This is why SLT AI was created. School leaders can't rely on tools that loosely refer to information that is a month out of date, let alone 10+...
  6. Hi, I'm the CEO of SLT AI and stumbled across this thread so can explain a little more. Firstly, we're completely GDPR compliance and meet all DfE requirements - the TLDR version is we don't share your data or use it to train any of our models. What makes us different to generic AI like ChatGPT or Co-Pilot? We have specifically trained our entire system on a huge array of educational guidance, policy and best practice so that our tools can give you an informed, and importantly, up-to-date response. We use a range of AI tools depending on the task at hand as different models perform better at different things so models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral and Google - which saves you having multiple subscriptions. We also contextualise each and every response with school specific information so you don't a general, vague response but something completely tailored to your school, your vision, you values, your context, your improvement priorities etc. Because we have built a range of tools, we are able to inject the correct information at the correct time rather than hoping a general AI will 1 - have access the background information we need and 2 - use this at the right time. For example, we published a SEF Converter yesterday. Simply upload your current SEF it will analyse, compare with the new OFSTED framework catergories and criteria and then output a new SEF based on all this information with gradings and recommendations. We have also built features to allow teams to share school specific information etc etc. Essentially, could you achieve what we do with generic tools? Yep, absolutely. It would just mean a lot more work for you - e.g. hunting the right guidance, adding your school policy information, OFSTED comments, improvement priorities, adding school context, iterating your prompt, finding the best model for the job etc etc etc. I run weekly webinars giving a quick tour of the site, please do come along, all feedback welcome! https://calendly.com/slt-ai/slt-ai-webinar
×
×
  • Create New...