SteveBentley Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 Im guessing the reason for the tighter beam width and focus is primarily to improve reception in the target footprint whilst keeping transponder power usage as low as possible. A side effect is keeping the broadcast contained within UK borders thus complying with the distribution rights of the content owners. I suspect the rights owners are the main reason for this. For a while certain ITV regions weren't available on Freesat (you got a neighbouring region) because there wasn't space on the UK beams for them. They went onto a wider beam and had to be encrypted, so weren't available to Freesat, only Sky. The broadcasters have to pay Sky for the encryption platform, so being able to use a UK targetted beam is cheaper for them.
sted Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 I suspect the rights owners are the main reason for this. For a while certain ITV regions weren't available on Freesat (you got a neighbouring region) because there wasn't space on the UK beams for them. They went onto a wider beam and had to be encrypted, so weren't available to Freesat, only Sky. The broadcasters have to pay Sky for the encryption platform, so being able to use a UK targetted beam is cheaper for them. is that why dave isnt on freesat but is on freeview/sky for instance?
Michael Posted December 7, 2012 Posted December 7, 2012 is that why dave isnt on freesat but is on freeview/sky for instance? Sky pay certain channels to keep them exclusive to Sky on satellite. This is how/why in a of respects they have the majority of the market.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now