Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Having a play with an old CachePilot of ours and wondering as it has two network ports, is there any beneffit of connecting both or just keep it as standard and use one? (Ports are on the main board and not separate cards, come up as Intel Pro/100 S Server in device manager) Have installed Server 2003 on it at moment with thoughts of just playing with VirtualBox. Its not for anything major, just so I can try a few things out leaving our main servers alone.
Posted
If you do it you will need to use the intel software to team them. Doing that will give you double the bandwidth and failover. If one NIC fails the other will take over. Plug one port in one switch and the other in another if a switch fails you can carry on.
Posted
If you do it you will need to use the intel software to team them. Doing that will give you double the bandwidth and failover. If one NIC fails the other will take over. Plug one port in one switch and the other in another if a switch fails you can carry on.

 

I believe that, if both NICs are active, it's recommended to only to this on stacked switches to avoid the CPU overhead of the MAC addresses changing on standalone switches. It depends on how exactly how often a rebalance may occur though (or if rebalancing occurs at all). XenServer does it every 10 seconds for an active-active style bond so it's a stacked switch or don't do it.

Posted

we used old crashpilots as firewalls and mail relays.

 

never got used for the intended purpose as the NIC was configured as per the RBC and our network was firewalled from the RBC network.

 

Rob

Posted

Just out of interest, how did you manage to get a windows server os installed? We have a cachepilot max here and I have tried on a number of occasions and not managed to get anything installed on it. It's still got the linux distro on it! If you have any pointers I would welcome them! I would like to use it for the exact same idea as you.

 

Thanks

Posted
Just formatted the disk, ours is an old one with a 200gb disk (2.4 celeron processor) , was left with a bit of the linux grub boot loader but using fixmbr from a windows disk got rid of that and then a straight forward windows install.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...