titch Posted January 28, 2012 Posted January 28, 2012 Hi doing some work for a course but have a question which requires me to use the I.P Adress 2011:5555:5555:1::5 . Now with my maths this should be 2011:5555:5555:1000:0000:5000 which just isnt long enough. What am I doing wrong? gonna kick myself I know! Cheers in advance
Jona Posted January 28, 2012 Posted January 28, 2012 (edited) In IPv6 Notation: “The use of “::” indicates one or more zeros.” so the address expands to: 2011:5555:5555:1:0:0:0:5 So just fill the address with zeros until you reach the correct number of bits. Edited January 28, 2012 by Jona 1
sjatkn Posted January 28, 2012 Posted January 28, 2012 I'm no expert in IPv6 but doesn't :1: and :5: translate as :0001: and :0005:, adding leading rather than trailing zeros. 1
titch Posted January 29, 2012 Author Posted January 29, 2012 thanks Jona. New it would be something simple. Also sjatkn you are correct about the leading rather than the trailing.
adil Posted January 30, 2012 Posted January 30, 2012 When we write: 1:5: its definitively means: 0001:0005: but in the case given in original question "2011:5555:5555:1::5" , double colon only replace consecutive zeros ,so here full IP address would be "2011:5555:5555:1000:0000:0000:0000:0005"
Naughty_Nigel Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 Our new 2008 R2 Standard server has IPv6 set up on it by default, but this is not configured properly. . I am reciving error messages saying that the IPv6 network adaptors on the server should be set to static IP adresses (as they are with IPv4). What would be the reccomended settings, or can we just disable it althogether? (Our IPv4 adresses are 192.168.0.2 for the LAN, and 192.168.0.30 for the internet connection. The router is 192.168.0.1) NN
CyberNerd Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 What would be the reccomended settings, or can we just disable it althogether? (Our IPv4 adresses are 192.168.0.2 for the LAN, and 192.168.0.30 for the internet connection. The router is 192.168.0.1) NN Disable it. IPV6 is useful for internet addresses but as your using NAT your never going to run out so it isn't really worth bothering with.
Naughty_Nigel Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 Disable it. IPV6 is useful for internet addresses but as your using NAT your never going to run out so it isn't really worth bothering with. Well that was quick and decisive! Thank you. I guess it is easy enough to re-enable it if we ever needed it for some bizarre reason. NN
Mehmet Posted April 9, 2012 Posted April 9, 2012 When we write: 1:5: its definitively means: 0001:0005: but in the case given in original question "2011:5555:5555:1::5" , double colon only replace consecutive zeros ,so here full IP address would be "2011:5555:5555:1000:0000:0000:0000:0005" This should be 2011:5555:5555:0001:0000:0000:0000:0005.
Michael Posted April 9, 2012 Posted April 9, 2012 I agree, you should disable IPv6 on 2008 R2. I suppose eventually you could use it internally, but it's more suitable for the continuous growing number of websites or internet connections to end customers. This is where DNS will help even more, without the user required to remember even longer strings of numbers.
Arthur Posted April 9, 2012 Posted April 9, 2012 (edited) What would be the recommended settings, or can we just disable it altogether? You may want to read this and this before deciding to disable IPv6. The recommended setting is to leave it enabled. Edited April 9, 2012 by Arthur
Michael Posted April 9, 2012 Posted April 9, 2012 Just to clarify, I meant disabling IPv6 on DHCP Server, not disabling IPv6 on the NIC itself, which I do leave alone. I presume this is OK Arthur?
CyberNerd Posted April 9, 2012 Posted April 9, 2012 You may want to read this and this before deciding to disable IPv6. The recommended setting is to leave it enabled. lol there had to be some hard-coded gotcha on windows compared to any logical operating system
Michael Posted April 9, 2012 Posted April 9, 2012 Yeah. That should be fine. Phew, I thought I was missing something for a second. Thanks
SYNACK Posted April 9, 2012 Posted April 9, 2012 lol there had to be some hard-coded gotcha on windows compared to any logical operating system Just for certain services and at least their IP6 stack worked unlike the Apple one which blackholed connections for quite some time if a site had a AAAA record and no native external IP6 was around. Its OS stuffups like this and dirty little APs that crash when exposed to IP6 traffic that have given many places all the excuses they have needed to hold it back this long.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now