Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeay, this is excellent news

 

We have Windows storage server 2003 which includes iSCSI target, and I've been wanting to upgrade it to 2008R2, but to cost of a WSS upgrade is several hundreds as there is no educational discount. iSCSI is the only thing that has been keeping me from installing Server Standard on it as we use it as a low-cost dev SAN for VMWare. This means that we can get our file server compatible with Windows 7 finally (after upgrading the clients last year) with out having to shell out.

Posted

Missed this when it happened last week as I was on holiday, but have been catching up today.

 

From what I see, this leaves SIS as the only remaining feature of Windows Storage Server that you can't get with regular Windows Server. It it worth it? Well, here's the stats from my main files shares (size vs. size on disk):

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9936

 

Granted, the total data size is not huge, but the percentage is significant. Just over 1/3 of the stored data is using no additional space (I'm not using compression, so SIS is the only thing reducing the size on disk). Scale that up to larger schools and if your usage patterns are similar, that's a significant saving.

sis.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...