aleach2 Posted April 19, 2011 Posted April 19, 2011 Stayed with RM as vanilla networks tend to be created in the shape of the current technician. Technician leaves, result, new technician takes nearly six months to unpick the previous work and then change it into their image. At least with RM I have some stability as I am not dependant on an individual technician. Documentation?
Disease Posted April 21, 2011 Posted April 21, 2011 As far as I am concerned any damage that occurs to RM as a business is a good thing. RM=Profit over Provision.
JATSO Posted April 26, 2011 Posted April 26, 2011 We have dropped RM and some other schools are following. I was at a meeting last month and the RM rep seemed worried from the response from the floor when everyone stayed quiet at his request for any questions. Look out RM the milking cow is running out of milk!
the_quick Posted May 4, 2011 Posted May 4, 2011 The biggest disadvantage of RM is cost. it is not bad tool, but for what it is, I don't think it worth the quotes they provide (I have RM CC3). Plan for this summer: remove RM servers, start with fresh domain under win 2008R2. Huge job, but I'm sure it will be worth it. There are more people in IT Windows network literate than RM network, so Vanilla is much bigger standard.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now