tech_guy Posted February 24, 2011 Posted February 24, 2011 I thought Anon had denied hacking these nutters as they had more important things to do?
MkII Posted February 24, 2011 Posted February 24, 2011 I thought Anon had denied hacking these nutters as they had more important things to do? That's what it says in the interview. Lies from the WBC - they're so stupid to think anyone can't see how they're trying to bleed this for publicity. I'm all for them having freedom of speech to display their abhorrent behaviour for us all to be disgusted at it.
CAM Posted February 25, 2011 Posted February 25, 2011 More serious cyber-crime being carried out by Anonymous. Seems to be their party trick at the moment.
Fatmas Posted February 25, 2011 Posted February 25, 2011 More serious cyber-crime being carried out by Anonymous. Seems to be their party trick at the moment. They keep stating it wasn't them and had nothing to do with them. Since they always have no problems admitting to their actions, I would be inclined to believe them. However Anonymous is such a loose term and any band of 'hackers' could claim to be acting on behalf of Anonymous.
MkII Posted February 25, 2011 Posted February 25, 2011 The attack certainly wasn't by anonymous, but the individual named in the video. What is it with people commenting on something they haven't watched??? Anonymous DID post a page on the website as the WBC representative stated that anonymous couldn't do anything... http://api.browsershots.org/png/512/d1/d182f4c25d5ef3a56a25d48eee29e932.png
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now