Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Not saying it's false but sez who? Based on what? And has it been formally verified by the Guinness World Records?

 

Actually I said we have the best IT equipped schools in the world, and we, in the UK do. The official ratio of pupils-to-computers is 5-1, ut according to Ray Fleming at Microsoft it is in fact closer to 3-1. The country with the next largest pupil to computer ratio is the US with 12-1. Its jst a shame the education secretary wants to stuff it up. In the UK we are in the best position globally to produce a generation that can not only support, but advance this increasingy IT centric world, but instead we are to regress to the kind of education system my parents had. What's the point of educating kids in the mid 20th century for them to have to live and work in the 21st century?

 

/rant off

  • Thanks 1
Posted

The last set of figures I can get to quickly (2009 Harnessing Technology Review) has the ratio as 6.6 in Primary and 4.2 in Secondary but that does not take into account handheld devices or games based devices, so it is closer to Ray's figures (he was talking about Secondary at the time).

 

We are likely to see those figures drop officially as schools will not be able to include student owned devices in there, but in some places, if you include student owned devices, you will start getting 2:1 ... or even better.

Posted
What's the point of educating kids in the mid 20th century for them to have to live and work in the 21st century?

 

Thing is, it was only last year that we had Current ICT and Computer Science in schools - damaging to UK’s future economic prospects (doubtless discussed here somewhere), bemoaning how profligate and usually adept use of IT, gadgets etc.. is not translating into kids studying computing, which is apparently necessary if you have ambitions to advance that IT centric world.

Posted
Thing is, it was only last year that we had Current ICT and Computer Science in schools - damaging to UK’s future economic prospects (doubtless discussed here somewhere), bemoaning how profligate and usually adept use of IT, gadgets etc.. is not translating into kids studying computing, which is apparently necessary if you have ambitions to advance that IT centric world.

 

You might find the following video interesting as to why there is this disjointed view about technology is good/bad in education. The paper should be interesting when it is published.

Learning Without Frontiers - Our Blog - Keri Facer, MMU, LWF Talk, London 2011

  • Thanks 2
Posted

Good work guys, really enjoyed it. Some very useful information that's given us food for thought.

 

Any chance of getting a copy of the presentation?

Posted (edited)
You might find the following video interesting as to why there is this disjointed view about technology is good/bad in education. The paper should be interesting when it is published.

Learning Without Frontiers - Our Blog - Keri Facer, MMU, LWF Talk, London*2011

 

Our MSP initially blocked the video feed to the site, now the whole thing's blocked! :mad:

 

Would appreciate notification when the webinar becomes available.

Edited by beeswax
Posted

Thanks for doing the Webcast, I watched it and learnt from it... I think it would have been good directed at headteachers & management teams as well as network managers & technicians...

I'd heard that there was a new MS Schools solution in the pipeline, and that explained a lot, I was straight on to my MS Reseller for info!

 

Thanks again!

 

Rick

Posted
Like others I didn't receive the email, spam filter checked :(

 

Got an email to watch the webinar "On Demand" this morning. Shame I didn' tget the live one yesterday, but at least I can now watch it.

Posted
My link was caught by the council filters but watched it through another route. For those who are interested there is a session at Alan's school which will also cover cost saving amongst other things ... details are on the MS Education blog (available on the EG home page).
Posted

Does anyone know who counts in Microsoft's FTE calculations?

 

If we had to include all the cleaners, dinners ladies, school crossing patrol that never get anywhere near the computers, but are still employed directly by us, it would make a large difference to the FTE headcount!

Posted
Does anyone know who counts in Microsoft's FTE calculations?

 

If we had to include all the cleaners, dinners ladies, school crossing patrol that never get anywhere near the computers, but are still employed directly by us, it would make a large difference to the FTE headcount!

 

It does not count 'non-computer' using staff IIRC. Just teachers, admin and IT people, and possibly the site supervisor if they have one.

Posted

Well done all - much useful information and I now have a list of bullet points to research :)

 

We've used much of our specialist college funding to up our PC numbers and are now better than 2:1, but we're a small school with a School Agreement so the news from Microsoft was VERY welcome :)

 

Am I at liberty to forward my "now available on demand" email to my line manager and SLT? I'd like them to see the webcast too - or is there going to be another link for unrestricted access?

Posted

I spoke to someone this afternoon about MSs FTE meaning. What MS think of FTE is anyone member of staff that works 200 hours a year or more (or 5 hours a week or more) and has access to a computer. In our case the catering staff and cleaning staff dont have access.

Posted

Just watched this at home as it's blocked through our LEA connection. I'm not sure it will change the way our management work but it sure has given me a new outlook on how to prepare for what may be coming. Than you to all involved.

Posted
You might find the following video interesting as to why there is this disjointed view about technology is good/bad in education.

 

Yes it was interesting, but my reaction is a quantum theory-like superposition of states: approve of some honesty, disapprove of some of the truth that delivered.. knowledge economy is tosh was fine.. tech is not a panacea (words I've used here before) was fine... but then the bit that disturbed me.. they were only playing along with that to advance their real agenda. And I don't entirely grok that agenda, the collaborative spaces in which next generation will learn to survive the rest of the century.

 

Perhaps the paper will be more enlightening, but suspect I'll just file it under abstract meta-blather and then get on with something that makes a real, immediate change for the better in some small corner of the edu-tech world.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...