Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

Has anyone actually used Truecrypt to encrypt their MS Windows 2003 servers running CC3?

 

If so:

  • Did you have any issues, or in hindsight - steps to be taken before encryption took place (excluding making backups)?
  • Was there any slowdowns greater than say, 5 - 10% in performance?
  • What effect (if any) has/could happen if the RAID failed ie; a single HDD failure?
  • Restoring data - if the server has to be built from ground up - any known issues?

 

I appreciate your help and contributions..

Posted

Are you talking about encrypting the system drive? So you are asked for a boot password?

The only problem i can see is that you can't reboot the server remotely. You will have to be physically in front of the server for it to boot.

You will also have problems if you need to repair windows in the command line.

Posted

Hi & thank you for replying..

 

I'd like to encrypt the system drive, the other partitions and their extended partitions etc (the whole lot) if possible.

 

I agree about the remote booting/password problem any suggestions? - maybe its worth just encrypting the data drives and not the system drive?

Posted

As FN-GM says, you wouldn't be able to remotely reboot the server, and we have found ours to play much nicer if it has a weekly reboot.

 

Can I ask why you're thinking of encrypting the server though? Once you have booted it, it is in effect, UNencrypted, so an encrypted server won't help security on pen drives etc, it will only benefit if your server is stolen.

Posted

well, if the server is stolen then it would need that encryption/security in place - that's the idea, the question is has anyone actually used Truecrypt (version 6.3a?) with partitions and their extended partitions and if so was it successful and were there any pitfalls etc?

 

But I take your point about the server being logged in and in an "un-encrypted" state, but primarily if the server is taken then the data is useless to the baddies. This goes for the Admin / MIS server too.

 

I guess the next question after this is by using BackupExec 11.d, how or are the backup tapes encrypted for removal to an off site area!?

Posted
I guess the next question after this is by using BackupExec 11.d, how or are the backup tapes encrypted for removal to an off site area!?

 

At the time of backup, the files would be unencrypted, therefore so would the backup. We use a Truecrypt-type program on our removable disk-based backup, and I know our backup program creates a password-protected zip file which should work on a tape-based backup (note it does require twice as much free space in order to do this).

Posted
Was there any slowdowns greater than say, 5 - 10% in performance?
According to this article, the performance hit is quite big (around 30%) when using BitLocker and processors which do not support AES-NI. TrueCrypt will probably be similar if you use AES.

 

What effect (if any) has/could happen if the RAID failed i.e; a single HDD failure?
This depends on the RAID level used and would be no different than if you had unencrypted disks.
Posted

Thank you for your replies, I'll look into the links and come back to this.

 

So, quick recap:

 

Truecrypt installed on server 2003:

Can be installed but not necessary to encrypt server as it could be a slowdown in performance.

Can be installed but not necessary to encrypt server if its in a locked room.

Can be installed but could go on to server even if it has RAID (5).

No one replied (yet!) if they have actually installed Truecrypt.

 

Backup tapes (using Backupexec):

Should be backed up and encrypted.

Could/can double the space used on tape.

 

Thank you for your guidance..

Posted
Can be installed but not necessary to encrypt server if its in a locked room.

 

Hmm they can always get through that. On our Server 2008 servers we use bit locker.

Posted
No one replied (yet!) if they have actually installed Truecrypt.

 

I appreciate your help, maybe we can get Server 2008 next year.

Posted

Let me clarify what I said about doubling the space - I didn't mean that a 10GB backup would become 20GB, what I meant was that the backup would still be 10GB but you might need 20GB to create it. When BackupAssist does this, it creates the regular backup file, then creates an encrypted copy and then deletes the original, so the end result is the same size, but it needs double the space as a working area.

 

I haven't installed TrueCrypt, but I am using a product called Cryptainer, which works in the exact same way, i.e. create a separate encrypted container folder, mount as a new drive letter and then back up to it. Only reason I paid for that was because I didn't know about TrueCrypt at the time.

Posted

@Krunched:

 

Have installed TrueCrypt on CC3 but only to create a container for the SLT to use via a shortcut from their program sets. It works really well for document storage but for taking stuff off site we use this:

 

Free Encryption Software - Password Protect Files and Lock Folders

 

The free version works very well have given it out to the staff via FTP link and networked it also and created shortcut for the staff to use with their USB pendrives, Just works a treat. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...