Geoff Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 Just noticed it didn't have any. A simple oversight I presume?
vikpaw Posted July 21, 2010 Posted July 21, 2010 Some of us have started adding our own now. Certainly for [sIMS].
ZeroHour Posted July 21, 2010 Posted July 21, 2010 Added a few now, please tell me of more as I only know a few... Currently: [sIMS] [bROMCOM] [CMIS] [E1] [PHOENIX GOLD] [PASS]
vikpaw Posted July 21, 2010 Posted July 21, 2010 Is CMIS serco? Could perhaps do with a [general] or [cross platform] and maybe an [open source] . there's too many around at the mo' to be specific.
TronXP Posted July 21, 2010 Posted July 21, 2010 CMiS is serco but I think they just call it Facility now
john Posted July 22, 2010 Posted July 22, 2010 CMIS name no-longer exists Shaun (well does in my mind and internally when you get an "old-timer") Its Facility now. But I'd put Serco as a lot of people call it that and they have actually got more than just Facility as an MIS so maybe Serco is a better tag
Geoff Posted August 3, 2010 Author Posted August 3, 2010 You might want to add PARS to that list as it's a separate bit of software to SIMS from another company
GREED Posted January 22, 2012 Posted January 22, 2012 *cough* Can we add Aspen to the list now please?
john Posted January 22, 2012 Posted January 22, 2012 Progresso needs to go on as some of us are using that now / will be using that shortly
vikpaw Posted January 23, 2012 Posted January 23, 2012 Wouldn't Progresso come under the Serco umbrella? There is a sticky thread in MIS forum, where i started a different discussion, when i went through and tagged all the most recent threads. I'll see about adding, TASC and ASPEN.
john Posted January 24, 2012 Posted January 24, 2012 Wouldn't Progresso come under the Serco umbrella? There is a sticky thread in MIS forum, where i started a different discussion, when i went through and tagged all the most recent threads. I'll see about adding, TASC and ASPEN. No needs to be separate as its a completely separate product range and shares no ties with Facility so best be on its own, thus things you do in facility wont work in Progresso etc...
vikpaw Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 No needs to be separate as its a completely separate product range and shares no ties with Facility so best be on its own, thus things you do in facility wont work in Progresso etc... @john - I know it's not consistent at the moment, but the idea is, they differentiate the companies' product suites, so it's easier to filter on them. At the moment, there are so few other than SIMS, that are discussed, i left them as they are. I've got CMIS changed to Serco, so that can capture any of their products. Does that sound okay? Maybe down the line, we'll need sub-prefixes, but you know there are hardly any support issues for Serco anyway, you just want a Progresso fan club to be set up @GREED - Aspen is there now - don't abuse it Also put in TASC as PARS and Insight have been getting quite a lot of mentions lately.
GREED Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 @GREED - Aspen is there now - don't abuse it Mwahahaha.... No seriously thanks very much Vik
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now