Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

There must be enough brainpower in this photo to cause an intellectual black-hole. Even if some of those photographed disliked the very idea of the black hole.

 

http://ginasiomental.com/016.jpg

 

Oh, can anyone see Schroedinger's cat? I can't; maybe it is dead...

Edited by Andrew_C
Posted
Oh, can anyone see Schroedinger's cat? I can't; maybe it is dead...

 

Its probably still stached safely (or not) in its box. This crowd would definitely be extremely high grade zombie food. Probably high quality enough to furnish a large mob of zombies with intelect comparible with the average population of today.

Posted (edited)
intellect comparable with the average population of today.
More like the total IQ of a large country (between Canada and Mexico) seen in photo of 29 people. OK, I've an interest in physics / cosmology, but I know of 11 of these people, and the picture must be best part of 80 years old.

 

Is it the famous Copenhagen conference?

Edited by Andrew_C
Posted
Is it bad that I have only heard of 3 of them?

 

Schroedinger, Einstein (duhh) and Marie Curie...

 

in a word. yes.

 

but not as bad as not knowing what a slide rule is.

Posted

I'm not going to loose any sleep over either of those things.

 

I was never a keen scientist, I have the occasional interest, nothing warranting worshipping old men, nor am I old enough to pre-date the advent of a worthy scientific calculator, hence no requirement for a slide-rule.

Posted (edited)
More like the total IQ of a large country (between Canada and Mexico) seen in photo of 29 people. OK, I've an interest in physics / cosmology, but I know of 11 of these people, and the picture must be best part of 80 years old.

 

Is it the famous Copenhagen conference?

 

Now your just being mean, Im sure the people in the photo were smater than that :D I was talking about a particularly large mob of zombies.

 

It looks like this was here File:Solvay conference 1927.jpg - Wikimedia Commons (Fifth Solvay Conference on Physics, Brussels, 1927)

 

Is it bad that I have only heard of 3 of them?

 

Schroedinger, Einstein (duhh) and Marie Curie...

 

I find myself constantly thinking of Planck :rolleyes:

 

(I've heard of 7 of the people in the picture)

 

Admittedly I have an interest in science but off the top of my head:

 

Piccard - Explorer, high altitude ballons and first deep sea subs - Basis of ST:TNG captins name and heritage

Schrödinger - Quantum state superpositions

Heisenberg - Heisenberg uncertainty principal

Bragg - DNA

de Broglie - wave theory, light etc.

Bohr - Bohr model of the atom

Planck - the Planck constant

Curie - Radiation

Einstein - General realitivity

 

It looks like the wikipedia photo has links to all of the people in question explaining their contributions.

Edited by SYNACK
Posted
I'm not going to loose any sleep over either of those things.

 

I was never a keen scientist, I have the occasional interest, nothing warranting worshipping old men, nor am I old enough to pre-date the advent of a worthy scientific calculator, hence no requirement for a slide-rule.

 

oh i get it now, your first post was a rhetorical question...

 

btw, the slide rule predates my school experience aswell, but the reason i know what it is is because as a word/term it's entered into our common language or vernacular.

 

or atleast i thought it had.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...