srochford Posted December 13, 2008 Posted December 13, 2008 Petrol (at the pumps) has dropped by 25% since its highest point in the summer. But the cost of petrol (by the barrell) is over 50% of its price in the summer. Nearly 70p in the £1 goes to the government through fuel duty and VAT. And the pound sterling is only worth 75% of what it was last year; we pay for oil in dollars. None of this changes the fact that fuel has not gone up by more than inflation; it's actually come down!!! Perhaps it could be cheaper but that's not what you said!
Theblacksheep Posted December 13, 2008 Posted December 13, 2008 (edited) None of this changes the fact that fuel has not gone up by more than inflation; it's actually come down!!! Every year since 1993 the price has gone up at the pumps above 'natural' inflation, late 2008 is the exception, due to the collapse of the crude oil price. Even then we are paying more than what it should be (in line with the crude cost)! Edited December 13, 2008 by Theblacksheep
enjay Posted December 15, 2008 Posted December 15, 2008 But wasn't there a turnout of just over 50%? So, a better turn-out than your average General Election, then?
srochford Posted December 15, 2008 Posted December 15, 2008 So, a better turn-out than your average General Election, then? Err, no, not by a long way. Turn out at UK general elections has averaged 74% in the past 60 years (numbers from the electoral commission) Although it is lower this decade, it was still 61.4% in 2005
enjay Posted December 15, 2008 Posted December 15, 2008 Indeed, I stand corrected - it is just local elections which have a very low attendance rate, I had thought it was both local and General. Local authorities trialling all-postal pilot schemes saw turnout rise to an average of 50% in last night's local elections in England. In comparison, only a third of the electorate visited the ballot box across England as a whole. Source - Postal voting increases local election turnout in England - Electoral Commission
e_g_r Posted December 15, 2008 Posted December 15, 2008 I dont think so... from: Home to: Work - Google Maps 10.6 miles on Google map for walking so by bike you could do that in an hour!!!! from: 53.573346,-2.158813 to: M27 0BH - Google Maps I do the same miles journy to work by bike with some very evil inclines to rochdale/Littleborough
sidewinder Posted December 15, 2008 Posted December 15, 2008 10.6 miles on Google map for walking so by bike you could do that in an hour!!!! from: 53.573346,-2.158813 to: M27 0BH - Google Maps I do the same miles journy to work by bike with some very evil inclines to rochdale/Littleborough Although you might struggle (read: die) on the M62 on a bike! So he would have to find a different route. And to be fair, while 10 miles is doable, its not going to be the nicest journey at this time of year. I'm 5 miles from work and do cycle sometimes but its a depressing experiance in the rain
Gatt Posted December 15, 2008 Author Posted December 15, 2008 A certain scene from Hancock springs to mind with what you can do with that idea..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now