Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has anyone come across this error before? I think this is what is preventing clients from connecting to the printers.

 

2025/08/11 14:07:45 pc-queue-handler.exe: STDERR|ERROR: Deployment failed: execute deployment: print client not ready to print: send request: Get http://localhost:9265/status: dial tcp [::1]:9265: connectex: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. {"src":"deploy.go:152"

Posted

Not specific to Papercut but most “actively refused” errors are normally firewall/port related

 

have you deployed all the settings for it?

 

steve

Posted

Have you linked the printers to the users?

 

i don't think it works without the agent being installed by the user part (well we couldn't get it to) requires admin rights to install

Posted

Thank you. That's the part that I realised last night, each user has to install the agent, to get the authentication token within their UserData.


Wasn't immediately clear.

 

Just noticing if a computer is sat idle, it seems to lose the connection after a while. Do the copiers need to stay awake 24x7 as I think they go to sleep currently.

Posted

Ours don't - however it has been known to lose connection if a computer went to sleep/hibernate - reboots usually solve it.

 

Be careful of any profile config settings you have, unless your devices are one to one.  deleting profiles deletes the tokens so they have to go through the rigmarole of installing again

Posted

If your devices are managed via Intune the process is slightly easier, if you deploy the add on "Desktop App deployment with Microsoft Intune", user then simply click on start printing via the email invite.

Posted

Having the same issue here with a lot of devices, we have a super node configured. For end users, when printing it shows that either the handle is invalid, and crashes the app they are printing from, or the print queue shows as offline. There is some success with manually starting the pc-print-client executable and restarting the device.

Posted (edited)

They do say, its best with 3 to 4 supernodes.  We also demote all other devices from being nodes as we were finding that the nodes that the print jobs were being held on were laptops and things that don't stay on - there for print jobs were being "lost" or delayed by hours before being replicated and printed.  Yes were are almost back to having a "print server"... almost negates the need.  Also not having the ability to delete nodes is quite annoying - especially if they are personal machines of staff who left

 

This stabilized our network a lot and now we don't lose things and can trouble shoot a lot easier.

Edited by Scifigirl
extra moan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...