SID6581 Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 (edited) Hi all, Just a quick question about the setup of aspects and resultsets within SIMS. We currently have a mix match of both of the examples below, depending on key stage and what it is used for, which I would like to redo them so all are the same. But I'm wondering which is the correct way if we wish to use tracking grids etc which we do not currently use. 1. Aspects: Maths Resultsets: Capture1 - Current Level Capture1 - Predicted Level Capture1 - Effort Capture2 - Current Level Capture2 - Predicted Level Capture2 - Effort 2. Aspects: Maths - Current Level Maths - Predicted Level Maths - Effort Resultsets: Capture1 Capture2 Or is there another way that I'm missing!?! Thanks in advance Edited December 14, 2018 by SID6581
Esteban_Child_of_the_Sun Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 There are a lot of subtleties and nuances to Assessment Manager. The starting point for any conversation around this is, What output/analysis do you want from the system? This will determine what method to implement 1
Jonsi Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 (edited) I've set it up similar to your 2nd example. I prefer my aspects to have a specific meaning and not dependant on a result set to define them. It also gives you more flexibility to have different grade sets for the various aspects - never mix different types of grade in a grade set. My result sets therefore are generally just a snapshot in time, but there are exceptions. Taking time to set up categories will help a great deal to filter the aspects, e.g. KS4 and Predicted. I haven't properly used the custom tracking grids however so I'm not sure of the best setup for those. Edited December 14, 2018 by Jonsi 1
bfelton Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 The first example wouldn't work unless you have the same grades for effort and attainment, you will also end up with a long list of resultsets which can't be filtered the same as the list of aspects. The second option in my opinion is the best and will work with tracking grids and allow for useful analysis, as the resultsets are each data collection you can make use of locking resultsets to manage data entry as well. 1
SID6581 Posted December 14, 2018 Author Posted December 14, 2018 Thank you all for your help and advice, I'll migrate all the legacy systems over to example 2.
Esteban_Child_of_the_Sun Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 Thank you all for your help and advice, I'll migrate all the legacy systems over to example 2. Bear in mind that if you do that some graphs/analysis will no longer be accessible to you (some of that could potentially be mitigated by using the same grade set). E.g. some of the Discover graphs that show all 3 strands over time on the same graph, or some of the analysis grids that show all 3 together, etc. 1
vikpaw Posted December 18, 2018 Posted December 18, 2018 @SID6581 If you are doing a redesign, some sound advice in this thread: http://www.edugeek.net/forums/mis-systems/43559-good-am7-data-structure.html 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now