Jump to content

Cisco SG500X or HP/Aruba 2930f, any one got either of these units? How are they.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Both these switches support true stacking, consume about the same amount of power, the Cisco on paper is quieter but slightly more power consumption. Both appear to have limited warranty. Both models with 10Gb uplinks are around same price.

 

I've had a SG300 before now and was not overly impressed TBH. Whilst I am very slightly more comfortable in the HP CLI the Cisco does appeal to me.

 

Any thoughts or anyone with experience of either the 2930f or SG500X.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

This was actually for Home network.

 

I went for 2 Ubiquiti ES-16-XG's in the end. Although they can't stack and do not give any redundancy i.e. VRRP I can live without these. Spanning tree works on the EdgeSwitches (unlike the US-8-150W I had) and have actually replaced the HPE1920 I had with a ES-24 Lite.

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

We actually bought about 30 2930f's for work and these seem OK although the building is not finished yet where thay are installed. The 2930f can now stack up to 4 units and there is an imminent firmware update to allow stacking up to 8 units, so we have been told.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...